if I knew more
I'd say less (Trouble Sleeping)
killdeer feigned splintered then rose banked & compulsed by otherlove again & again flopped so
so cold exoneration if to hatch safe poems alone & nudge from each a stunt proud dodo/minion (Hearthedral: A Folk-Hermetic)
In
a recent issue of Event magazine, Toronto poet Phil Hall wrote
about what he calls his "totem bird," the killdeer.
Our national bird, for years, was,
as A.M. Klein said, the rocking chair. I don’t know what our national bird is now, but my
totem bird is the killdeer. Its names, odd mannerisms and cry explain
a bit about me, but in riddles. My daily writing self at 50 has accrued the usual
odd habits and noises, of course. There are awful names I know myself
by, lie-dances I perform to avoid work.
In my hopelessness, I half hope my deflections might honour
the Self... In open fields my shorebird ranges. It nests near
cow plops and hooves. Its only protection is a desperate little theatre. If a person or a creature approaches its eggs, the
killdeer pretends to have a broken wing. It flits near, then hovers
away. One wing splints forward at an unnatural angle; its cry seems
so plaintive. Intruders are diverted from the eggs by a chance at
catching the bird. Like that wounded arrow-maker, Philoctetes, I have
a broken wing of sorts. There is something wrong with my hands. Eczema?
Stigmata? Nerves? My palms, red and dry, split along the lifelines
and bleed. It is hard to wear white shirts, for instance. My quill-mitts
have been like this for years.
In
an interview with Phil Hall in Toronto in 2002, conducted by Mick
Burrs/Steven Michael Berzensky and published on Hall’s University
of Toronto “Canadian Poets” page, their conversation ends with:
Ph: I’m trying to say what I really feel, which is
not necessarily what I want to be cornered in to saying.
MB: Well, I’m sorry if I’m cornering
you.
Ph: No, no. It’s just that I’m reluctant to speak
about myself and by so doing reveal how important this all is to me.
You know my emblem bird is the kildeer. It shows up often in my books.
The killdeer, by pretending to have a broken wing, tries to distract
and lead away those who come too close to its eggs. I make stupid
jokes, plunk the banjo, tell funny stories. These distract, they entertain,
they lead an audience away from seeing my eggs, seeing how scared
the nest of poetry is to me.
I'm just letting you see the eggs tonight. But my
experience is that if people really see that something is vital to
you, they'll take it away. [Laughs.]
MB: Because you've had that happen to you?
Ph: Yes. But I'm publishing books, so where the hell
can I hide? I have to hide in the open air.
Phil
Hall has been an interesting figure in Canadian poetry over the past
few decades, beginning to publish while in Windsor, Ontario, where
he got his MA, and later coming through the work tradition in Vancouver
around the same time as friend and peer Erin Mouré, before eventually
ending up in Toronto, where he works as an editor and teacher. Much
like Mouré, his poetry moved further out from the "work poetry"
tradition and into a range of non-linear language, but somehow got
far less attention over the years, despite a flurry of activity, including
the chapbooks Eighteen Poems (1973; revised, 2005), The
Crucifiction (1979), A Writer’s Guide To Restaurants (1982),
Unison-Light (1985), The Bad Sequence (2004) and (as
Holly Phillips) Les Transparents (after René Char) (2002),
and trade collections Homes (1979), A Minor Operation
(1983), Why I Haven’t Written (1985), Old Enemy Juice
(1988), Amanuensis (1989), The Unsaid (1992), Hearthedral,
A Folk-Hermetic (1996), Trouble Sleeping (2000) and An
Oak Hunch (2005), as well as a cassette of labour songs. As he
is described on the poetry spoken here web page of the League
of Canadian Poets:
Phil Hall started out with what has been called,
by Tom Wayman and others, "work writing" ideologically driven
poetry that passionately pursues the experience of ordinary people
in occupations and with preoccupations not often highlighted or even
acknowledged by those in political or literary power. That is to say,
Phil has not turned his back on the outsiderhood he grew up with.
Instead he has made himself a voice ― often a tough voice ―
for the deprived and the marginalized. At the same time, Hall's writing
has been changing over the years. His poetry has never been marked
by the emphasis on mere content and accessibility that might be expected
from a work writer, but in recent years his language and forms have
been stretching experimentally. He is a writer now wonderfully difficult
to categorize, though he himself has made a stab at joining the extremes.
In a piece from The Unsaid (Brick Books, 1992), he says "I
am becoming more hermetic and more populist at the same time!"
That's Osip Mandelstam and Woody Guthrie.
Through
decades of poetry collections, part of an influence on Hall's writing
can be seen from the work of the poet Paul Celan; there are traces
of Erin Mouré, Don McKay and René Char; and even as Hall has worked
decades in the book as the unit of composition, he has yet to appear
properly in a major anthology of Canadian poets, missing out on Gary
Geddes' expansive series of 15 Canadian Poets anthologies,
Ken Norris' Canadian Poetry Now: 20 Poets of the '80's (1984),
Dennis Lee's The New Canadian Poets 1970-1985 (1985), but included
in anthologies of work poetry such as Shop Talk (1985). Ask
any writer who has experienced his work, and they tend on the whole
to admire it greatly. They say timing is everything; he seems not
to have been part of any specific grouping of Canadian poets, but
for his time in Vancouver as part of the Vancouver Industrial Writers
Union, and even as he's been a Brick author for the past twenty years,
he somehow doesn’t properly seem to fit there, either. It seems interesting
that he would consider his emblem bird the killdeer, suggesting that
his own writing works hard to distract the reader away from what is
right in front of them. It's as though through his poetry collections
and refusal, almost, to place himself, Hall's poetry has been
difficult to place, and difficult to explain, leaving him to slip
repeatedly (even he would say, deliberately) off the radar. Hall could
be considered a variant on the tradition of work poetry that would
also include west coasters Tom Wayman, Kate Braid, Gerald Creede and
Peter Culley, but that wouldn’t properly explain it either. Writing
working class poems in an Ontario gothic that references physical
abuse, geography and writing itself, it is almost through the shifts
that exist from book to book, Hall works against the reader properly
having any sense of his work that is easy to categorize, which might
explain the component of critical silence on his poetry generally.
Through a series of works honing and altering what he is best at,
Hall's poetry is dangerous and difficult, both in terms of structure
and emotional content. As translator and critic Michael Hamburger
once wrote of the poetry of Paul Celan:
From whatever direction we approach it ― as
plain readers of poetry, as critics or literary historians, as biographers
or sociologists, or as translators ― Paul Celan's work confronts
us with difficulty and paradox. The more we try to concentrate on
the poem itself, on its mode of utterance, which includes both theme
and manner, the more we are made aware that difficulty and paradox
are of its essence. As for "placing" his work within the
body of German imaginative literature after 1945, or against the larger
background of international modernism, all we can be certain of at
this point is that it occupies a prominent, isolated, and anomalous
position.
Phil
Hall's poems work the writing by working to alter what the writing
and the process of writing means; through threads that
include his token bird, the killdeer, and childhood abuse, his long
poems work variations on what can also be seen in the expansive lines
of Prince George, British Columbia poet Barry McKinnon, and the Canadian
ghazal brought forth by the late American expatriate John Thompson.
When we handle things and then write
words we speak of that interchange of prayers
but when we handle only pens
we begin to pray to our pens for words
that are solid excuses for having to let go ("Pay-Dirt,"
Amanuensis)
Originally
from Bobcaygeon, Ontario (think of the song "Bobcaygeon"
by Blue Rodeo), he moved to Windsor, Ontario in 1972, where he later
published his collection Homes (1979); as the back cover claims,
"This book represents three HOMES: where I came from, this adopted
city, and a Home for the Aged I worked in for a year. Where I am is
always a style bender, so I give credit to these places for these
poems, dwelt in and now rented to you."
Living in Windsor now I always go to Rudy's when I need a haircut. Why
do you call this place
Rudy's? Shut
up and sit down! But today I've been thinking about my dad, how he chokes up over the phone now, and has to hang up to spit in the sink when I say good-bye. So I don't go to Rudy's Hair Salon but to his kind of place: Al's Barber Shop. Do
you cut hair? Ya. Will
you cut this
one? ("Memorial Hall," Homes)
Windsor
is also the place where Hall started publishing chapbooks and other
smaller pieces of ephemera by himself and others under the name Flat
Singles Press, with small pieces produced by Bronwen Wallace and others,
and where he wrote the book A Minor Operation (1983), being,
as he wrote in the front of the book, "posthumours poems written
in 1983. In December 1982 I got a vasectomy. Much of what's here responds
directly or indirectly to that." Apart from Prince George, British
Columbia poet Rob Budde, I don’t know too many Canadian writers who
have written about getting a vasectomy (the title poem, subtitled
"and plotted perhaps too freely with my life," even includes
illustrations). Hall ends the small book with the title piece, and
its own ending, writing:
So this is the child of our love for each other
this knowledge of the operation
the choice we made in our favour
the dream we knew we'd forget so we wrote it down
It unites us the way a child might have
but does not threaten to tear us apart over money or the right to be selfish
We want only what's best for ourselves
In
an interview conducted by Pauline Butling and Susan Rudy in the collection
Poets Talk: Conversations with Robert Kroetsch, Daphne Marlatt, Erin
Mouré, Dionne Brand, Marie Annharte Baker, Jeff Derksen and Fred Wah
(2005), Mouré references her Vancouver days and Phil Hall, briefly.
Erin: […] I didn't come from a community
were you talked about writing itself. Everybody was writing, but nobody
talked about it in terms of feminism, or in terms of the workings
of language. The only context I had found where people talked about
writing was the Vancouver Industrial Writers Union, which was full
of problems for me.
Pauline: Who belonged to that
group when you were involved with it?
Erin: Tom Wayman, Phil Hall, Kirsten
Emmett and Zoë Landale. At least those people talked a little about
writing, and I worked with Phil Hall and the others to organize a
reading series. Yet the whole orientation of work poetry and the theory
about it all really was problematic for me. It was populist in a way
that seemed to negate things I wanted to explore.
Part
of the Vancouver Industrial Writers Union, Hall ended up teaching
at the Kootenay School of Writing, back when one of the overlaps in
consideration at the school focused on work writing, given that the
poet Tom Wayman was one of those involved in the early days. Hall
was one of those influenced by the "new work writing," but
not held back by its limitations; consider the fact that whatever
movement they had out west during those times, apart from Wayman himself,
there is almost no one else left standing; their version of writing
work an idea that simply couldn’t sustain itself. As editors Michael
Barnholden and Andrew Klobucar write in their introduction to Writing
Class: The Kootenay School of Writing Anthology (1999):
"Hammer," an early poem
by Tom Wayman, who was also a Wobbly, illustrates the close relationship
KSW maintained with labour movements. In it, Wayman symbolically abstracts
the common tool of a carpenter ― the hammer ― into an
emblem of social unit among the impoverished working classes. The
image is hardly new, having signified basic labour in everything from
Masonic badges to the flag of the Soviet Union. What is fresh in Wayman's
poem is his descriptive prose, detailing the various working situations
the hammer must transcend. In the final stanza,
Nothing can stop it. The hammer
has risen for centuries high as the eaves, over the town.
In this age it has climbed to the moon but it does not cease rising everywhere
each hour. And no one can say what it will
drive if at last it comes down.
Wayman's interest in class struggle
is evident throughout the poem. All workers, regardless of their individual
working situations, share an important social bond derived from their
common oppression by capitalism. Class oppression and the need for
social change it subsequently provokes unites, for Wayman, the restaurant
cook with the carpenter, and both of them, oddly enough, with the
astronaut. Labour does not ever cease in this poem; but neither does
the need among labourers for emancipation and their social right to
own the relations of production. Only one year after KSW opened an
office on West Broadway near Oak Street, the school co-sponsored,
with the Vancouver Industrial Writers Union, a colloquium on what
Wayman and others were calling "work writing." Among the
issues discussed there was labour's unclear future within a Socred-administered
province. Such political uncertainty generated a specific confusion
regarding KSW's own relationship to conventional labour groups.
The
Split Shift Colloquium of August 1986, called the first North American
symposium of contemporary work literature, included both Canadians
and Americans as participants, such as Phil Hall, Tom Wayman, Erin
Mouré, Antler, Kate Braid, Sandy Shreve, Howard White, Clemens Starck,
Susan Eisenberg, Robert Carson, Jim McLean and Kirsten Emmott. As
Wayman himself wrote of work writing in his essay, "Split Shift
and After: Some Issues of the New Work Writing":
Work writing, on the other hand,
states that every job has importance in society and that whoever does
that work is an expert concerning the value of this work and how this
work affects individual and community existence. Therefore each of
us has the right to speak out and be listened to, irrespective of
financial status. The present educational and critical apparatus is
not likely to devote a sustained effort to promoting this message.
Whatever
statements on poetry and poetics that Hall himself has made over the
years have been shifted and even circumvented as poems slipped into
various of his own collections, echoing what writers like Erin Mouré
and bpNichol (and since, nathalie stephens and Margaret Christakos)
have done, merging poetry and poetics as opposed to keeping them separate.
Prince George, British Columbia poet Barry McKinnon has also written
a number of prose/critical pieces that suddenly shape themselves into
poems, almost as though the poem itself, as for Hall, is his
best thinking form. The piece "Inner Handles," for example,
that exists in the collection The Unsaid, was revised from
Hall's own statement of purpose written for the Split Shift Colloquium,
that begins:
I have this recurring dream of swallowing
the dagger that figures in one of Borges' stories.
Its blade comes out my stomach, and
its handle remains inside ― opposite of how a blade lodges in combat.
Then I fall, stabbing my shadow and
its earth. The point enters its counterpoint.
This is a poetic dream of process and
intent.
Each of my poems is a fortress built
for a party. How entrancing the melodies of opposition to self
can be! How useful the poems that leave all their handles inside!
Useful: the lathe inside grinding out hopefully elegant
tools.
Having a grip on the handle inside me allows me to
love the details of this world, each gimcrack/talis-shard.
Obviously
Hall is mentioning Borges; is this another deflection? Is this another
wounded wing? The piece seems instead to echo the language of a John
Newlove poem that originally appeared in 7 Disasters, 3 Theses,
and Welcome Home. Click (1971) (Newlove is mentioned as an influence,
briefly, in An Oak Hunch):
Everywhere I Go
What are people talking about. Everywhere
I go they whisper.
They stick their eyes at me, right
at the base of the breastbone, when I'm not looking.
The breastbone seems flat, pointed
like a dagger to the top of my stomach.
O, my stomach, my stomach…when the
knife rips you open it will find coffee and four strips of bacon,
pieces of chewed beard and a handwritten note saying I have left
town forever again.
Another
of Hall's pieces from the same collection, "Tillsonburg,"
first appeared as an author's statement for the Vancouver Industrial
Writers' Union anthology Shop Talk (1985).
Tillsonburg
Stompin' Tom, in his song about tobacco
picking, mentions a town in southern Ontario, Tillsonburg,
and then says, 'My back still breaks when I hear that word.'
I understand his relationship between
health, place, work and language. Some words are that mighty,
that crippling. Certain place-names, if uttered, cause asthma.
Mention a mere file code number and certain people will stick
their fingers down their throats.
I write to cure myself of regionalism,
to break free from Ontario's plated dolour. I write for personal
and political revenge. Spite, given form, allows me to stand upright
and scan this field, wheezing. Allows spitelessness, music,
humour.
I mean each poem/word to be useful,
not clever. As practical as if found on a map. As if I had gone there,
worked there, been broken, quit and come back. As if you
could go there and find a better job than I did.
My simple anarchy mistrusts even tools,
and so I mean to grasp Hopelessness with my bare hands, pull
it out of the ground, and set it on fire in my mouth.
My goal is joy. Joy. But my back still
breaks when I hear that word.
Where
is Hall placing himself and his own poetic? It's as though Hall has
to remove himself "from Ontario's / plated dolour." so he
can return to it, and even reclaim it later on, in the poems that
make up his 2005 collection An Oak Hunch (but more of that
later on). Hall's aesthetic can certainly be considered shaped by
"work poetry," even as a point of foundation to what he
has done throughout his career, but by itself is only a part of something
else, and would ignore whole swaths of other threads throughout his
work. Put alongside Erin Mouré, who came through Vancouver writing
"work poetry" while a station manager at VIA Rail, and also
moved out from there into more experimental forms, Hall's poetry seems
more experimental than the work poets, but less overtly so than the
poetry of Mouré. Hall's writing process reads like a hammer (his plainspeak
and/or experimental leanings) taken to glass (his working class aversion
to preciousness), before deft hands carefully and deliberately re-assemble
the pieces into collage.
For
many years, the working class plain-speech of the "work poetry"
traditions in Canada seemed to go against the traditions and explorations
of any more formally experimental works. I don’t know if Wayman still
holds to this opinion (which reads as painfully oppositional),
but in another essay years earlier he referenced experimental writing
against a larger piece on "work poetry," suggesting that
Experimental writing has its own
social consequences, however. Formal experimentation (that is, experiments
involving artistic form) has increased during the past three-quarters
of a century to become what many artists now practicing think art
is supposed to be about. Formal experimentation, be it "new music"
or "abstract expressionism", is art about art. And that
means an end of a critique of society in art.
The
thing Wayman doesn’t seem to understand, insofar as this quote, is
the very argument between the modernists and the post-modernists,
with the former creating art to change the world, separate from and
working to represent the world, and the latter creating art that includes
the world, referencing the world from the inside. What Wayman doesn’t
seem to understand (or at least, when he wrote the piece) is that
postmodernism is more interested in the questions than it is
in authority, and that it is the language itself that
is political, and by itself can be used as a critique of society,
such as the work of west coast poets Jeff Derksen (one of the original
members of the Kootenay School of Writing), Dorothy Trujillo Lusk
and Peter Culley, who very much work out of both the traditions of
"work poetry" and avant-garde formal experimentation (think,
too, of the political poems of the late American poet Edward Dorn).
Even further, has been some of the work done by Vancouver poet Roger
Farr in his collection Surplus (2006), writing both regular
speech, writing theory, working class values and social action, bringing
the two halves of the original Kootenay School of Writing back together
in ways they haven’t been in decades, and expanding something rich
and rare in the considerations of Canadian poetry that have been barely
understood, let alone acknowledged.
It
would seem that Hall's consideration of "work poetry" might
fall somewhere in-between Wayman's aesthetics and the aesthetics of
the late Kingston poet Bronwen Wallace (Hall was one of her early
supporters, during the time they lived as neighbours in the same apartment
building in Windsor, Ontario). Kingston poet Joanne Page, editor of
Wallace's posthumous collection of essays, Arguments with the World,
wrote in the forward that
Attaching people, weaving them together
was Bronwen's great delight. Much was sheer Bronwen: generosity, scarves
and earrings, curves, outrage, curiosity, gardens. And just as distinctive
was her sense of place, or "location," to use her term.
By location she meant home, the center, a roof over the heart. She
loved the implications of home, how it was more than shelter, how
it mixed family history, daily life, friends, chili sauce recipes,
the patches of earth that are peculiar to each of us. Bronwen located
herself in the hardscrabble farms and lakes of southeastern Ontario,
identifying herself with her grandmother's runaway horse, tears on
a friend's cheeks, her father's Sunday grace, lemon balm and green
tomatoes, Jeremy's bike, an Emmylou Harris song, her mother's stories.
She anchored herself in this commotion of past and present. Her territory,
in writing as in life, was like the eastern Ontario landscape she
loved so well — the immutable realities that lie like bedrock beneath
the ordinary dailiness of life.
As
Page writes, the "anchoring" of daily life. As Hall wrote
in Amanuensis (1989), writing so many of his concerns together
in a poem that probably isn’t about ironing, writing:
Naked
Ironing my white shirt before another reading
pressing weight water and volts against every crease
thinking of what I'll read insecure doubtful memories
Mom from cuff to shoulder to cuff pushing a hot
toy boat
Dad directing traffic at the Kinmount Fair
shouting
drunk and rolling up
his sleeves Pressing my white shirt smooth
the way she taught me knowing I'll roll up my sleeves
Ironing the only crumpled page I brought to wear
Any
larger concerns of the Canadian avant-garde in poetry often fall into
either a geographic area or a series of stylistic groupings; Hall
seems to be one of a series of individual Canadian poets whose work
can't easily be placed in any sort of grouping or avant-garde "movements"
(whether what Bowering once referred to as the "Calgary renaissance,"
or the groupings around the current and past versions of the Kootenay
School of Writing in Vancouver and Coach House Press and/or Coach
House Books in Toronto…) ― Sylvia Legris in Saskatoon, Erin
Mouré in Montreal, nathalie stephens in Chicago, Judith Fitzgerald
in northern Ontario, and Stan Rogal in Toronto ― leaving many
of them misunderstood, and, much of the time, critically out in the
cold. The fact that Hall seeks very little attention certainly helps;
it's almost as though he has spent a concerted effort in keeping his
head down, what with very little written on Hall and his work over
the years (although the fact that An Oak Hunch appeared on
the Griffin Prize shortlist might perhaps see a change in perception).
Are these critical failures a sign of Hall, or a sign of the times?
What
seems interesting in the response Hall predominantly gets for his
poetry, working the seeming contradictions of language and work, those
who might know more from the work side don't seem to comprehend the
other, and even see his movements combining them as some sort of poetic
failure; they seem to like the work well enough but don’t entirely
comprehend it. Is this a failure of the poet or the critic? As northern
British Columbia poet and critic Don Precosky wrote as his rather
harsh review of the collection Amanuensis in Literature
and Language:
This is a thin book of wan poems. The author displays
some wit and skill at word play, but he does not get much beyond the
surface. The postmodernist talk about "writing" and "language"
with which the book starts was fresh 10 years ago but is now getting
stale. Furthermore, it is more convincing when it comes from poets
who are doing a good job.
Later
on in another issue of Literature and Language, a review James
Deahl wrote of the collection Hearthedral: A Folk-Hermetic:
Although the title of this collection evokes Hermes
Trismegistus and such concerns as gnosticism, alchemy, and magic,
the actual poems are awash in existential angst and pessimism. Hall
is well versed in "the terrible punishments of humans inflicted
upon humans" (to quote Erin Mouré), and his book is full of historical
reminders of how brutish life can be. In Hall's poetic universe, the
Judeo-Christian tradition, secular humanism, and social activism are
all spiritually bankrupt, while death is the ultimate release from
suffering. Hearthedral
does break new ground in its use of language. However, its vision
is unlikely to appeal to readers who like their despair in modest
doses.
How
does he get treated so badly so often? In so many ways, Hall's token
bird could as easily be the magpie, something Vancouver writer George
Bowering has suggested of himself through his memoir, A Magpie
Life: Growing A Writer (2001). It's as though Hall's poetry is
continually picking up objects and placing them carefully in what
end up being complete poems in complete books; far more than a collage
than a significant whole. What has the magpie Hall picked up from
his father? What has the magpie Hall picked up from other books he
has read, scattered throughout his own texts? Is this the distraction
the killdeer is there to prevent, to keep the reader from seeing just
how much Hall has collected? In the collection Why I Haven't Written
(1985), Hall writes:
Each one of us is two stupid birds, our hands in our armpits, our faces
moronic.
Or
later on, in the poem "English" from the collection Amanuensis,
he writes:
Such foolishness as that, and more,
but really looking into your eyes' clear tan speckles
and shards I feel my upper-lip and eye-lids tug
hairward I am leaning that far out and down
to see wobble-lights in a purple current pass under me this bridge that is moving
this doomed London bridge to which all my self-portraits are
moored
Moving
from bird to bird, from son to father, from self-portrait to something
other, it's as though Hall is working the idea of the double while
using one to distract you from the other. What is it he doesn't want
you to see? Is this what the reference to Borges means, with Hall
locating his own self in the double, whether pseudonimously (as Holly
Phillips) or two birds? Vancouver poet Lisa Robertson has worked with
the double as well, such as in her long poem "Palinodes"
from The Chicago Review, where she writes:
Suppose I never saw deception No distinctions—just the fear of isolation
That structure was not finally my medium I am an animal I don’t know
Nor an orchard nor a single soul nor A dog nor a leather purse nor subjection
Nor trivialization nor worthlessness Nor apples and stars when the festival
Of war unfurls from garden suburbs and Decks the patios in grand coloured
Swags flipping upwards in the breeze bringing The shampoo scent of blossoms
It would be nice To interfere with the accuracy of the world.
It
seems interesting she would mention "the double" in a subsequent
piece on the poem, included in the same issue ("There is a doubled
sensation."). In her collection The Men (2006), too, there
is the talk of the double, moving regularly from the "I"
into "we" and vice versa. There is the collective and then
there is the individual, as she writes in the poem "MEN DEFT
MEN" from the same collection:
We are weary in the watching. I am.
What
is this double-speak she speaks of? What is this kind of doubling?
Writing herself as herself, writing herself as man, writing herself
as the men. Writing herself or writing narrator. It was something
prairie poet Andrew Suknaski wrote of again and again, predominantly
when referring to Eli Mandel (and therefore, Borges) in various of
his critical pieces, writing:
No, it isn't just the prairie
that drove some of us mad. It was the mutants in the lineage. Shakespeare
taught us that. Borges reaffirmed it in a healthy obsession with doubles:
Christ/Judas; Cain/Abel; Othello/Iago and others — fleshed-out binaries
of the tormented, human mind. No, it ain't easy to follow Mandel.
Or writing:
Eli, as I began to pass
the Bergman Apartments, your words faded in that coldest of all cold
nights I'd ever known. I didn't look right to what had once been your
window. I did remember, again, how you once talked of seeing your
double at the Cave n' Basin Hot Spring that one summer. I think it
was about then — as I looked back once at the place that once doubled
for home to you — that your dead ringer began to peel my name off
the cold aluminum sky illuminated by the city's light: "Andyyy!
Andyyyyyyy! Stop! Don't do it!" It didn't stop me. What actually
slowed my pace were the faint words of a woman I once loved. Miraculously,
her words surfaced again in my memory: "Andy, whenever I thought
of you somewhere, I imagined this Towering Spirit moving across the
Prairie . . . ." I stopped one block past the Bergman Apartments.
Abandoned my premeditated long walk east across Wascana Lake where
I might have confirmed the word with flesh. ("Mandel Memoir")
Does
this all come back to Borges? For Phil Hall, in a collection rife
with considerations of the father, the title poem to Why I Haven't
Written seems deflection again (writing "You failed me"
to an unnamed woman), a distraction against writing slowly about his
late father in ways that he couldn’t have previously, writing their
relationship as awkward and seriously flawed, and him as a gentle
man, as in the poem of the same name. In later collections, the mentions
of the father become more full, of that quiet, rural Ontario man who
knew little of conversation but much about guns and the land; the
father Hall knows he is different from, but afraid of becoming. Is
that where his double is held? Or at least one of them?
A Gentle Man
My father killed everything he could get his hands on. As a gentle man he made such a fool of himself.
The old paddle he shellacked after painting, looked stupid: little teepees, a tree. The man was vain about his trees.
I hated to see him, retired, at his work-bench in the shed; he was putting tiny white beads on the front sights of his rifles to help him see.
The only thing he did beautifully after that, was die. It seemed so brave, or selfish, the way he asked for water, then quit breathing the moment he was alone.
It
was as though from Homes on, Hall was writing writing and fathers
and mothers and what else that would come from there and through to
the late 1980s, from a construction of individual poems and more into
fragments of a larger, more ongoing poetry; writing so many of the
concerns of "work poetry" and rural Ontario ideas and ideals,
and writing out parts of his life in small fragments. It was as though
from Homes on, Hall too writing further and further away from
what poems were "supposed" to have looked like, as in this
fragment of the poem "Mould," from the collection Why
I Haven't Written:
Now I haunt the second-hand bookstores, loving the smell of old, terrible books:
The Little Lame Prince, Penny
Nichols, Freddy The Pig And The Baseball Team From
Mars…The
poor children who read those books now, who take
them home broken from the Salvation Army, are
receiving, as I did, slammed-shut concessions to
working class hope. They are eating what there is
to eat: the blue and green moulds that grow on silence.
I am allergic to mould. The doctors want to inject me with phrase-sized solutions
of mould till I develop immunity. Having scratched
through that wall with The Count Of Monte Cristo,
having sucked on the same smooth stone of
revenge, I avoid medicine the way my ancestors
probably tried to avoid the plague.
It
was in the 1980s, too, that Phil Hall started getting further attention
for his writing, and when he was slowly coming into his own, as in
the piece "Canadian Poetry: The Year in Review" in The
Third Macmillan Anthology, where Toronto poet and critic Kevin
Connolly wrote:
Phil Hall's eighth book, Old
Enemy Juice, struck me as a breakthrough for a poet whose style
and subject matter has attracted me, but who has always seemed to
overplay his textual persona, that of the gritty, blue-collar moralist.
In Old Enemy Juice Hall focuses on the overwhelming negative
power of societal concepts of manhood as they are handed down from
father to son and acted out in subsequent relationships. Hall uses
his own life failures and unwelcome patriarchal inheritance as the
material here, and while the slant is political, the poems themselves
are particular and personal. One of the strengths of this book is
that it does not assume a clear conscience on the part of the speaker;
it refuses to oversimplify the issue of abusive male behavior. There
are poems which deal explicitly with physical and mental abuse, but
even more powerful are those which focus on the subtler effects of
the masculine myth—on apparently healthy relationships, on the motivations
of the writer, on language itself. Editing help from the late Bronwen
Wallace may have been instrumental in harnessing Hall's intense and
unusual talents. In any case, the result is easily Hall's best effort
and a book well worth tracking down.
Old Enemy Juice is Hall's last collection of individual poems, but there
still seems an overlap of construction, and is probably his most effective
collection and single unit of composition up to that point. Hall's
work shows a strange and refreshing kind of vulnerability; strange
not just for him being Ontario rural male, but being human at all,
and that kind of vulnerability becomes very honest and refreshing;
the things held back in Hall's writing are those things held only
because it is necessary to, whether for the sake of himself
or for the poem.
His teeth marks convicted him as this old story does me
An 8-page rape fantasy I had forgotten
Wrote it 10 years ago and am shocked by what I unearth
Am forced to face another of my names It means mysogeny, mass murder
Ted Bundy is one of my names I must answer to, but am trying to
change
By an invocation of others I gladly go by ("Ted Bundy")
Writing,
as he says, another of his many names; is there more here than doubling?
There is something about the erratum held in at the beginning of the
collection I don’t believe is there accidentally, working a way his
further writing plays; writing error as deliberate, echoing Phyllis
Webb's notion of "failure."
ERRATUM
I can't keep the cockroaches out of my cupboards, the morbid doubts out of my head, the typos out of my books — nor can you —
The only perfect things I can think
of are dead and untrue:
acknowledgements: Rick Johnston
read Johnson
contents: What Times Does to Salads
read What Time Does
p. 20: right lights read rich
lights
p. 46: and the guilt read quilt
p. 75: build as air read us
air
p. 77: writing with convulsions
read writhing
What
is it about failure that attracts? Every poet, Hall has even said,
should have a book that fails (and some poets are lucky enough to
have more than one); at least for Hall, this is as far away from actual
failure as one gets. As Brian Vanderlip writes of the collection in
Poetry Canada Chronicle (Vol. 10, No. 4):
Phil Hall's eighth collection of poetry begins warmly,
with a quiet intensity. Hall is not exactly an intellectual poet,
more an emotional vision masked in intellect, injured by memory: "The
crumpled paper/ cup of my longing still/ floats// But will not hold
us/ both." Still, his heart reaches out in hope: "We must
not enter/ or encircle each other/ with that crude arsenal of words
we know/ are against us…" This poet doesn’t have a fantasy sunset
for lovers to disappear in; he's world-wise. But he does offer a vision
of shared humanity that enfolds both the positive and negative capabilities
of humankind, the need to realize our capacity for choice. Not only
does Hall allow for the most negative of possibilities, he relates
very strongly and personally to them. In the poems "Heart and
Anchor" and "Ted Bundy," Hall stands beside those criminals
we often view as the embodiment of utter evil in our world, the pedophile
and the mass-murderer. He calls the pedophile his brother and notes
that they look so much like each other. There is no hope in a merely
us/them perspective. The possibilities for love come from compassion
in the midst of our own experiences: "…a triumphant culmination/
of all that old caring/ we did less well." The
second of three sections, "The War In Ontario," focuses
primarily on Hall's blood family, especially his strained, bitter
memories of his father and the knowledge that in so many ways he and
his father are inseparable: "I write of killing him/ and find
him only alive in myself…" This is the most powerfully conceived
section of the book and the darkest in tone. In one of the best stanzas
Hall juxtaposes his memory of a mean, distant father with verses describing
the behaviour of a mother bear's cubs after she has died, the cubs
"(tearing her) apart in rage and hunger." He often acknowledges
this tremendous power of experience and memory, as in a lovely lament
in the third part of "The War In Ontario:" "How many
times on a bus or a train/ have I looked out at those fields/ I hate/
and seen them slowly become/ myself reflected in the moving window/
till morning?" The
final section of the book is the least cohesive, but does include
some strong poetry: "Swoop," "Life Support System,"
"The Holes In Trees," to name a few. Following the dark
strength of the father poems, these pieces seem to lack as strong
a focus, not coming together enough to deal with earlier elements.
Is the hope of strength through sharing ("Correlations,"
"Uttering The Chestnut," "Facing") reduced in
the end to only "…a tradition of resistance?" Are Hall's
songs finally destined to come from "…a scrapper… his songs up
like gloves?" I think not: stay tuned.
There
is something about his following poetry collection, the book Amanuensis
(1989), with its array of fantastic gestures and fine lines, that
somehow doesn’t hold together as a single unit in the same kind of
way; a small book with such a potential that it doesn’t quite reach,
but rife with echoes of what work had come before, and was still to
come, talking about fathers, writing and the killdeer. The collection
reads as both a continuation and progression of previous work, and
an introduction into further openings, such as the double of the two
men in Trouble Sleeping. As he writes again of his token bird
in the final poem-fragment of Amanuensis:
*
Killdeer there isn’t much to say
just here I am here I am
Another waving of old tools
as if they were broken wings
A thin plea my pain my pain
Lies dying out in the dry grass dying out in starlessness –
A few small poems have stayed warm ("To Be More
Round")
After
so much deflection, it seems interesting that Hall would talk about
a kind of clarity surrounding his place, writing "here I am /
here I am," and in bold, no less, seriously highlighting what
otherwise we might have passed over too quickly. The bird itself is
famous for the broken-wing display, to lead someone further and further
from the hidden nest of killdeer young; building their nests in open
areas, distraction is the entire point. In the title poem of The
Unsaid, writing:
Praise her curse this weight of thought ― killdeer brain shovel
In
a short review of Amanuensis in Books in Canada, Erin
Mouré wrote:
AS IT IS: dense, compact, elliptic,
fierce, without evasion.
Then they put our cages on wheels and let us (stinking of snacks) push
them— we push them out of their parking-lots into fields of wild carrot and chicory but they always find them and drag
them back shove each cage into the muzzle of
the next cage.
In Amanuensis (Brick, 64 pages, unpriced),
Phil Hall has come, by strife with words and their embedded values,
to a technique of compression that reminds of Paul Celan's knotted
poems; they beam straight through the skull. So that: "It is
a lark drinking rain-water from a sun-dial" and "oat-dust
gold along the snout-beam." Poetry that recalls the organs of
the body, that invents and compounds verbs, nouns, and adjectives
to reach toward what cannot be spoken, without censoring our hands'
flutter. It is poetry that "has been taught mockingbirds well."
Which is why, perhaps, Hall's work has been little recognized by those
grocers who are so invested in the cages and parking lots of the literary
supermarket. Never mind. It is recognized by those who want, instead
of supermarkets, food.
His
subsequent trade collection The Unsaid (1992), on the other
hand, returns to that sense of solid form that makes up a collection
by Phil Hall—a single unit out of a series of disparate forms, including
the title poem, made up of twenty-five numbered sections writing rape
and violence and accidents of beauty, writing out of labour songs
and Woody Guthrie echoes. In The Unsaid, Phil Hall saying what
he previously couldn’t but so long worked toward, and somehow, finally
did. In a review of The Unsaid in cm, Cambridge, Ontario
teacher-librarian Ian Dempsey wrote:
In one of Phil Hall's poems in The
Unsaid, he admits that he is writing to cure himself of regionalism.
The author is literary editor for This Magazine and is editor
of Don't Quit Yr Day-Job, a "labour-arts literary magazine." Hall grew up in the rough landscape
of the Canadian Shield under rough conditions, his father
slinging beer at night fixing & dealing old cars on
the side bootlegging at Curve Lake.
From this existence Hall ran "full tilt into
books." He became a "Mandelstam in Guthrie clothing,"
the classical Russian poet representing his inner compulsion for pure
art, and the American folk-singer and activist being the link to the
common, working life. This
schizophrenia is embarrassing at times in his poems, that is, it stops
us from entering easily into his experiences. His poems lack the precision
and grace of a classical expression, and only a few have the simple
directness of popular pieces. One
wonders how some of these poems would be greeted by the auto workers
in Windsor, for whom he conducted creative workshops at one time.
The poems are often dense and tricky, like the brush trails in his
native Haliburton. There are references to many poets and artists,
bits in italics, experimental blips, images that do not complete themselves.
For the poet, these may be the glimpses of sky, the far-off vistas
that will lift him out of his childhood losses. More of Guthrie would
have worked for all readers, sophisticated and simple, and had us
singing along.
That
"Mandelstam in Guthrie clothing" becomes a kind of umbrella
mantra for all of Hall's ouvre, writing out "pure art" against
a "common, writing life" but not out of any sense of schizophrenia,
but instead a sense of complimentary movements; how can one claim
that there isn’t pure art to be found in common music? Bronwen Wallace
knew, and wrote a whole collection of Common Magic (1985),
writing her own domestic and common moments into the essential poems
about living, or Hall himself, in the title poem of The Unsaid,
writing:
When I have dedicated myself to silences & death again
when I look at my hands & think instruments of hopelessness
then I force my thumbs into my belt-lops & think about Woody Guthrie in his last years of Huntington's Chorea
thumbs hooked into his belt-loops by attendants so his hands wouldn’t strum in wide
arcs & break against corridor walls
I walk his derailed impulses & try to engender within myself his humour & conviction
I listen to him until I regain my love of the complex squabble between biology & gravity
all our old pre-legal hankerings for
justice
solidarity with the inanimate
For
all of Hall's silences, the books themselves contradict those same
silences, as Phyllis Webb has written of her own from the collection
Hanging Fire (1990), "There Are the Poems,"
or critic Stephen Collis writing of Webb in his Phyllis Webb and
the Common Good (2007), writing "Poetry is language that
we notice. That is one place to begin." What is it about recluses,
whether accidental or deliberate (see also: John Newlove) that make
us want what we can't have? Webb writes in her piece almost accusatory
(even as she deflects to "Sharon," possibly "Thesen"):
There Are the
Poems
An editor asks me to put it all down: the reasons
I write. And I thought 'it' was a gift. Homo ludens at play among
the killing fields of dry grasses. Playful woman making a space to
breathe. 'There are the poems,' Sharon says, she means, between
the critical flash. There are the poems, like fists wearing
birthstones and bracelets, her 'roses & bliss'. Or they're like
legs running, bounding over the fields of force, momentum, for a quick
roll in Darwin's tangled bank. And there are the poets doing what?
And why, the editor asks. What does he want? Contributions to knowledge?
Civilization and its discontents? Chaos among the order ― or,
oh yes, french doors opening onto a deck and a small pool where we
can watch our weird reflections shimmering and insubstantial? The
proper response to a poem is another poem. We burrow into the paper
to court in secret the life of plants, the shifty moon's space-walks,
the bliss, the roses, the glamorous national debt. Someone to talk
to, for God's sake, something to love that will never hit back.
Or
Hall again in his own poem "A Mandelstam in Guthrie Clothing,"
writing
All an education's gotten me is distance
and vocabulary enough to (maybe) be precise about what haunts.
Storyless, how to proceed? Pastiche
is not a procedural heritage of my class background. Nor is dialectical
spoofing.
No pastiche, then. No goofing on voices
like or unlike my own. Symbols?
'When your Dad says money he means
another old car on its side in the yard,' Mom said, & so I'm
reluctant to use symbols, because, equated with lies, they are
not the story or its excuse.
Something happened, though. (Always
does.)
I ran. Full tilt into books. The forest
they are; the city they are. The me-not-home they are. The me at
40 they are becoming
as dreaming at lucid dawn I hear (last
month) an internal critic refer to me as 'a Mandelstam in Guthrie
clothing.' (Osip, of course; Woody, of course ― my
durable, unlikely godparents.) I see what that inner-critic means:
I am becoming more hermetic and more
populist at the same time!
Here
he writes a precursor to his "folk-hermetic," writing statements
as poetics as poems in a collection rife with such, hidden there as
poems, much like the Phyllis Webb piece. What does he keep hiding,
or is he in plain view the entire time? The complex structure of Hall's
Hearthedral: A Folk-Hermetic (1996) opens with a number of
pieces, including “You will know when the poem begins / but
reading shan’t accomplish this alone” and the page preceding,
writing:
from willseed sprout hearthedral
(Huckleberry gargoyle Blind Pew vaulted archway
Micawbered buttress) above ladders chamois
circling inlaid domes ungonged firebells
empty pews blank hymnals
this mortarsinew chorus will succeed
The
most overtly structurally complex of his collections, the book has
a number of openings, introductions and starts, but the first page
before the first section is where the real poem begins, as in his
“Introductory,” writing:
Iroquois, etc. &
Steam, etc.: these lists are borrowed from ‘Spadina Line,’
a public-art installation by Brad Golden
and Norman Richards. Comprised of ‘switch-post’ lights & metal words,
this work runs along Spadina Avenue north of Dupont Road in Toronto. (We
must, of course, credit Golden & Richards with the intrinsic poetry
that exists in the lists themselves.)
An official lamp lighting
ceremony for the installation took place on September 21, 1991.
These lists suggest developments from wild to rural to urban
Ontario land; they also echo the small, long-gone
railways that used to service mining towns & villages to the
north. In this poem these lists accrue parallel, private words &
meanings from wild to rural to urban, and in so doing
become word-girders for a catheral of low sorts.
A funeral is underway: the will has died. Pipes play the pibroch.
As David Jones says in his introduction to The Anathemata:
‘to make a shape out of the very things of which
one is oneself made.’
Canada is also dead. When nationhood is lost without resistance, hermetic & idiosyncratic chapels
of selfhood may still be worthy of defence and maintenance – toward (however covert
and puny) some other uncompromiseable community.
Built of hearth units between list pages, and culminating in
central spires of longtall parts, this poem aspires
to a structure – a possible section scheme of which is: ^
7
7 6
6 5 5
5 5 4 4 4
4 4 4 3 3 3
3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2 2 0 0 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0
Thanks to the City of Toronto Archives, Phil Hall, Cabbagetown, 1992-1996
The
collection works a wonderful interplay not just with writing but with
reading, quoting not just lines and works from authors, but their
characters as well. It even elicits a response from Richmond, British
Columbia high school librarian Willa Walsh, in her review published
in the Manitoba Library Association publication cm (Volume
5, No. 2), writing:
This collection of poems would be largely inaccessible
to most high school students. The strange vocabulary, with the intentionally
misspelled words and combinations of words would need an extensive
glossary to illuminate the meaning. It is similar to reading Joyce’s
Finnegan’s Wake. Newly coined words, such as “squalled furbs”
and “helexi” (p. 95), abtruse metaphors, esoteric references and obscure
diagrams, along with cryptic bits of word-poems, add to the complexity.
Some poems are more explicit (p. 25). Some are very
funny with their unexpected comments on life, e.g. “cakewalking thru’
the universe” (p. 42) and “the optimism of AM radio” (p. 55). Many
are irreverent and graphic. Words are thrown together like a collage
or arranged in lists - juxtaposed to give meaning or perhaps, no meaning.
These are adult poems and require sophisticated readers. “whatever
words meant has filigreed & transmuted” (p. 83). So true!
An
interesting, if skewered, response to Hall's writing, she actually
touches on a number of strengths of the collection, even if she considers
them weaknesses; comparing the collection to James Joyce, for example,
as a bad thing, and suggesting that the text needs a glossary.
Is the notion of art supposed to include how quickly a disinterested
high school student can enter? Hall's is a poetry that has the reader
learning as the writer does, moving through his exploration of the
world, through what is going on inside him, in the larger world, and
through the language itself. You can't provide shortcuts for that.
Otherwise, Andrew Vaisius seemed to have a much better time in the
collection, writing his review of the collection as part of a triple-book
review in an issue Prairie Fire (summer 1998):
Almost from his first lines Phil
Hall insists on a revaluation of words and the community of words
we know as language. "[T]his mortarsinew chorus / will succeed"
of the introduction merges into a "mortarsinew chorused"
at the conclusion, and this collective future grows in the sprouting,
bifurcation and uplifting of those willseeds we recognise in our Hearthedral—the
heart, hearth, echo of cathedral and vestige of the geometric hedral
of the title supply the internal warmth—mortared with the Amy Coshes,
Schlomo Goldhabers, bluegrass pickers and others whom Hall pens in
order to speak for us in individual voices stripped of self-serving
and manufacture. His poems may protest ("living ministries,"
"to evoke Amy Cosh") but they are not polemics. Hall is
busy creating a new context with his hard packed lines, his word blends,
puns and plays, and his radiant imagery. This is fortifying, and sometimes
gloomy, writing (if only to remind us that gloom is being human, too).
It is writing brave enough to encounter despair and walk away piping
a pibroch of enlightenment about our common ground of joys and sorrows.
I hear F.R. Scott's wise poem "Dancing" in Hall's own take
on parenthood, playing a balance game with his young daughter:
I am walking on the thread of my
daughter's safety faltering as I proceed …………………………………………………… if she falls into the net her eyes
will open to the dangers of the net
if I close my eyes & dance will
I ever find her?
Some lines are lambswool in pointe shoes: "I
who am a mess & a failure / at everything words refer to // believe
in absolution / by exactitude of usage," and "hope is work
do not be ashamed"; while others are the gravelled shoulder of
the Transcanada Highway: "nailzedded barnboards / on white grass
& cutworms" and "their deaths bequeath dilapidated pride
& vacuity / ― a dustball compost for my credence / who was
not born to serve hands-on silently." Hearthedral is a
dowsing and a drilling and a cold uprushing from depths—it's a masterwork
by an accomplished poet.
His
collection Trouble Sleeping (2000), which was short-listed
for the Governor General's Award for Poetry, is written as a haibun
(a Japanese form of interwoven journey-prose and poetry), a form worked
previously by such Canadian poets as Fred Wah, bpNichol and Roy Kiyooka,
but used by Hall as a single long poem very specifically talking about
family, fathers and sexual abuse during his childhood in Bobcaygeon;
writing his roughneck past as rural Ontario "white trash."
Unlike the long poems of McKinnon, which work up to a central line
in the first half of the piece and then away from that line, Hall's
Trouble Sleeping works up to its ending, writing as its final
two lines "If I knew more / I'd say less" at the end of
a two-page closer that also includes another echo of the double, writing:
the whole story is not my father always threatening to disappear up lumber
trails that lead to a khaki Trenton findable only two fingers
at a time
until tracheotomy sprung him […] narrative won't solve this
piecemeal din that is not 'archivally sound'
nor democratic […] the whole story is not just mine
to unearth by pageantry ― is a multiple common held in trust ― is what be/longs
us […] & the silence between the versions
is where the reverence holds
The
story is not just the beginning, but how it's played out, and how
the story continues to be written through his combination of tellings,
under- and over-telling, providing an unrelenting tension that holds
the whole book as a single piece; in poems that struggle through variations
of Hall's central concerns of the individual "I" walking
through a series of personal histories, high art merged with the common
folk song, and the capacities of violence, whether physical, emotional
or sexual. In a review of Trouble Sleeping in The Antigonish
Review (No. 127), Crystal Bacon writes:
Like many novels, Hall’s haibun happens as
much in the interstices between pieces as it does in the writing itself.
It requires a suspension of disbelief, a trust that the peices will
coalesce, and they do. The world portrayed in these poems - because
even the “prose” is really poetry - is harsh and beautiful. It’s the
world we all inhabit, but seldom see unless we have been cast out
of the snug circle of the “fortunate.” Our gain is also our loss,
however, as Hall shows in his ability to transcend the larger culture’s
perceptions of his “kind” by using the broken pieces of dreams, families
and opportunities to reflect back a thing made more beautiful by its
fragmentation:
Spearing pineapple rings from a can with a stick
piqued by the moment’s tenacity - its appropriation of
the wrecking yard around the epiphany
I have unfolded the road map of the axhead
& found even in its wagon ruts & foot paths
the same devotion to flung balance - the same hierophany
a tree displays in its cold twigs & seed tips &
unfullblown asymmetrical ornament-hammered gasket- crumbled
(Father a serial killer of pets Mother a falsie shielding a prone tick)
(27)
Once
the violence of Trouble Sleeping becomes and comes out, a thread
becoming wider and more overt throughout the whole of his collections,
it seems almost purged through the process of this collection, compared
to where he eventually goes in An Oak Hunch (2005). Writing
of one of the fragments of the collection as a "How Poems Work"
column in The Globe and Mail (November 17, 2001), poet Glen
Downie writes:
Thus, in a few words, Hall evokes
and links family, rural culture, social class, crude sexuality, abuse,
violence, alcohol, sentimentality, loneliness, and repressed rage
― all the themes of this book, and of most of Hall's work. Without
narrative or even verbs, the piece succeeds because words and names
always come from somewhere; they suggest parameters of era, region
and milieu. Pent lilt indeed! The lilt of a
word's music, our music, our meaning, is in the words we pen, or pent-up
in the words we don’t. Our proximity to sex, violence, anger and affection
are all there. Each of us could write such a poem with our talismanic
characters. In poetry, the words are who we are.
Despite
the fact that the quoted section of Downie's column could refer to
a whole range of Hall's writings, here is the actual segment he quotes
for the column, from Trouble Sleeping:
Boxer, Tippy, Chico, Sugar, Dobbin Dobby, Mimi, DeeDee, Princess Little Johnny-Fucker-Faster, Rusty Warren, Uncle Bobby Sweet Daddy Siki, Whipper Billy Watson Wilf Carter, Hal Lone Pine daddle-daddle, bullrod
The
weight of Hall's rural Ontario, his backwoods Ontario gothic, obviously,
weighs very heavy upon him ("MAN DIES CRUSHED BY HIS OWN ADDRESS,"
he writes at one point), but through the poem feels much lighter,
as though exercised through the process of writing it out, and as
a subject, changes in further books. What in this collection writes
sparingly almost, and between so many of the lines, becomes more overt
in his previous collection, Hearthedral: A Folk-Hermetic, sitting
as a reference between other sections, running as a thread tying together
all of his books, writing:
because of what happened to me at 5 I can't sleep beside my son or bathe
my daughter innocently ― yet a diaphragm
between thoughts & deeds between lungs & guts
How
does that compare to an earlier fragment from Amaneunsis from the
poem "Rudolph Hess," writing:
When I was 8 I quit sucking my thumb climbed down out of the apple tree and started shooting ― rabbits
groundhogs porcupines starlings
raccoons fish a dog and
nearly my sister ―
As penance I choose to worship by touch-study each day's blunted detail ― and end up wishing I had fountain-white eye-brows like him ―
Or,
as this untitled poem, one of five included in a 2005 issue of the
Vancouver online Forget Magazine, where beyond pain and hurt
and guilt he even talks about forgiveness (while referencing
the renowned "Woodland School" Ojibway painter Norval Morrisseau,
Copper Thunderbird) writing:
Me & Morrisseau were both abused as kids both drank like carp then sang by hand of a Canada that deplorably survives high in the clawed glistening air
Our giant muskrat soul kept falling apart into butchered townships aflame with
primal colour & the spit of the grease was the shared song of the brush & the pen slicing
through forgiveness
Trouble Sleeping, and what pieces come after, read as someone who hasn’t
necessarily escaped his past but survived it, and moved on;
survived it, and managed to turn it into something that wasn’t only
not bad but something better and even good. Compared
to his previous work, An Oak Hunch (2005) reads as a love-poem
to rural Ontario; the collection reads as a generous exploration and
joy. It reads as something far more comfortable, and, while not without
baggage, not overcome by baggage either, through writing Ontario landmarks
such as Ottawa Valley historian Joan Finnegan, and the late Ameliasburgh,
Ontario poet Al Purdy.
KILLDEER
on my oozing stumps has
drummed her wings long & hard
whipped the years' butcher block rings into
crèche shavings
beaten nests of feathered chips by
simulated soar
folded herself into my pages boatingly
her desperate ruse of broken wing has
settled into gunwales
her closed cry a
prow's nib
the stumps' roots I
thought destined to be fences
are a mob of keels righting little
brown-speckled eggs
safe—adrift—hoving-to as
cloud-shadow swamps fields
the age of flight is followed by
the age of sail (An Oak Hunch)
Written
as a series of five long poems as five essays, An Oak Hunch
has a wonderful sense of the multi-vocal, whether in his piece "The
Interview," dedicated "to Joan Finnigan, her devotion to
voices other than her own," the piece "An Oak Hunch: Essay
On Purdy," or the last section, "Index of First Lines"
(subtitled "an angry mob of basted journals) that Hall talks
about in his notes, saying that "This poem is a boiling-off of
first lines from earlier books to try to see more clearly the sub-narratives
that have keeled the life—a Windex of First Lines, perhaps—a
compacted Selected Poems, perhaps." This suggestion becomes
interesting considering how difficult it would be to actually compile
a selected poems of Phil Hall, with so much of his work produced in
longer forms and moving into the book as unit of composition, the
way much of bpNichol's writing was. How would you be able to select
any into a single volume that represented his entire oeuvre?
FROM PLOSIVE TO DIGRAPH, from willseed
to peregrination, over the peaks of the
resolute hills, through the windows of the tall buildings,
I was alphabetizing the obvious (a chickadee—a
minted toothpick—a crying-at-bingo smell).
Saying the old, chipped words, I liked
to think I was helping them to pray too—words
don't know how to read, books
don't know how to read—they need my weak eyes—I thought, like some
missionary to island lepers—and the words were the
missionaries— I am the one with these stinking wounds
in the palms of my hands—these gifts? —my
articulate hands that can not make straight arrows.
Pity Philoctetes, ye summer boaters,
who roar past his island in your floppy
hats, flinging empty beer cans at his pines—the epauletteless
shadow of the blackbird flies out of your marshes
too—its flight a red and yellow wound, its cry
a coffin hinge.
Less
on the wounded bird, Phil Hall's An Oak Hunch reads more as
an admission of the poet-as-magpie, collecting everything, including
himself. You can see it in his piece "An Oak Hunch: Essay On
Purdy" that thanks, in the notes at the end, "the Silversides
Pioneer Tool Collection at the Rideau Canal Museum, Smiths Falls,
Ontario." What the text doesn’t tell you is that the pioneer
tool collection he speaks of was donated by the father of his wife,
Ann Silversides, and that the un-donated remainder of tools, doorknobs
and other bric-a-brac sits in a variety of forms of organization in
their cabin, barn and shed near Perth, Ontario, filled to the nearly
brim with the kinds of rural Ontario collecting that Hall himself
has been doing for decades in his poems.
PITY WHAT IS LEFT OF US & OUR COUNTRY as we dismantle & burn for cheap
warmth
the guy-tropes he brought forward on his back to get us here & past here
After
finally seeing Phil Hall read, in Ottawa in August of 2005 at the
TREE Reading Series, it stressed the importance of both ritual and
found objects in Hall's writing and reading process. The reading even
began with a ritual he has of placing small and otherwise ordinary
enough objects on a table beside where he was to perform; if you were
visit the family cottage in Perth, Ontario, you would discover the
range of found objects that are organized throughout the property,
from machine parts to a series of found photographs (one is on the
cover of An Oak Hunch), and the collection of two complete
decks (so far) of found playing cards. As he wrote in his piece "A
poetics essay (rewritten)," posted on The Griffin Trust For Excellence
in Poetry website:
I perform when I read. I care whether listeners have
a good, provocative, magical time or not, so I try to ritualize &
make sacred the time during which I share my work. For this, the text
needs not to be sacred. It is a show, not a slide-show of the pages
of a book.
Humour; storytelling; fetishism; the long, amateur,
oral memory; call & response; repetition; reference to literary
characters & traditions; all of those are part of what I try to offer along with & in among poems
and parts of poems.
One of my models for a good show is Bruce "Utah"
Phillips who will mix a musical concert with Wobbly history &
personal history, blending these with songs (his own & by others)
toward a learning & lightening of the assembled group ―
a chautauqua.
Such
a list of things even appear in the title poem of the collection The
Unsaid, writing:
When I look into Neruda's hunger for collector's items I see a splashed reflection of my own magpiety
―
not Voltaire's inkwell or 'the only authentic Sphinx bone' I starve for ― but folk oddments my tribe's fetishes ―
half a doorknob, a bird's beak a VIA Rail coat button, a carved wooden
acorn the vertebra of a Cretan fish a token good for one loaf of bread from L. Catlin Bakery in Revelstoke B.C., 1936, a money clip concealing a jack-knife & file
How
does Hall make a list poem seem more than just a list? Responding
to the presentation to the work in An Oak Hunch, poet and critic
Ruth Roach Pierson starts her review of the book by writing:
What a complex, many-layered, rich work An Oak
Hunch is. Should I confess my sense of inadequacy vis-à-vis this
book up front? I think Phil Hall might. When I agreed to review this,
his most recent volume of poems (the 15th if one counts
the four chapbooks), I had no idea what I was letting myself in for.
Initially I was somewhat baffled by the words on the page. But when
I heard Hall read at my local Toronto bookstore (Another Story on
Roncesvalles), I was captivated by this poet whose reading of his
own work infuses it with heart and viscera. Turning off my pedantic
'demander-of-full-understanding brain' I began to hear the muscular
musicality of the poems, to respond to their emotions. I was hooked.
After
hearing him read myself, it would be very hard not to be hooked;
Hall performs a very personal and warm welcome to his audience. For
An Oak Hunch, the collection that marked his twentieth year
publishing with Brick Books, the press release begins with:
Phil Hall’s aesthetic is like no other in this country.
He remains every bit as much a “people’s poet” as Milton Acorn or
Tom Wayman, but he loves the arcane and the experimental as well as
the plain. His work reconciles these opposites, making him an experimental
poet with a populist heart.
Unlike
much of his previous work, the book received significant attention
as part of the Griffin Prize Canadian shortlist, along with titles
by compatriot Erin Mouré and Saskatoon poet Sylvia Legris (who went
on to win); a shortlist that was called "risky by conventional
poetry standards" by Patricia Robertson in The Globe and Mail.
As CBC reporter Barbara Carey wrote:
If Nerve Squall is all electricity, Phil Hall's
An Oak Hunch is like the scabby, weathered stump of an old
tree, full of what Hall calls (in a typically striking phrase) "treasure
knots in wood." In this ninth collection, the Toronto writer
reinvents the poetic staple of personal anecdote by digging up the
"sub-narratives" of a life growing up poor in rural Ontario.
The poems encompass family history ("The Great Hunger had destroyed
crop after / crop of my ancestors… I had to eat their stories to know
them, had / to plant and plow under their little songs in mine")
and tributes to other writers with whom Hall feels a kinship (in a
poem about CanLit great Al Purdy, the wind in a cornfield is "the
paper applause of an ancient voice"). Hall's poems are no picnic
to read. They're densely knotted and halting (as he puts it, "Pain
― the sharpener / has attached a grindstone"). But their
stunning metaphors make An Oak Hunch a strong contender.
In
the piece "Reading Outside: Phil Hall" that he published
in Calgary's weekly ffwd (Thursday, June 22, 2006), Calgary
poet and critic derek beaulieu wrote of Phil Hall's still-recent tenure
as writer-in-residence at Pierre Burton House in Dawson City, Yukon:
Phil Hall has never really considered himself a Canadian
poet ― even to the point of writing that "Canada is dead"
― but his recent residency has partially shaken his "pretty
disgruntled" feeling towards Canadian nationalism.
Hall argues that Ottawa forgets that much of Canada
doesn’t look south to the United States for inspiration ― an
opinion that was reinforced during his four-month stay at the Pierre
Berton House (the former house of that most Canadian of authors) in
Dawson City, Yukon. "Newfoundland looks to Ireland, and the majority
of the films entered in the Dawson City Short Film Festival came from
Scandinavia," he says.
Hall wanted to "go north," feeling that
Canada needs to integrate a knowledge of its north into its sense
of self, so that we are not satisfied to determine simply as "not
American." He was embarrassed, then, to find his Canadian nationalism
was bolstered when he looked out of the Pierre Burton House to see
the former homes of the British-born Robert Service, and the American-born
Jack London.
For
all the Ontario gothic in the content, can we argue a placelessness
in his language? Hall is very aware of language and place, but the
difference is, he doesn’t let either of them get in the way, using
them both as jumping off points and tools for exploration; to know
Hall's references is to know enough to find them in his writing, to
read so deep that they can't help but let themselves be found. Referencing
the American poets Clayton Eshleman and Robert Duncan, both influences
on the poetry of Phil Hall, beaulieu goes on to write:
Eshleman most famously has combined interests in
poetry and archaeology into manuscripts that engage in "psychological
cave-digging," while "Robert Duncan said that he had a primal
base for intellect, not a studied one, and claimed that he had the
advantage of starting with no talent at all."
"Eshleman spoke of his writing as a struggle,
and his writing has evolved through physical work, psychological work
― his themes have changed and forms have evolved. I am drawn
to the idea of poets having a failure book and a wonder book."
Hall is reticent to define his poetry around a single
subject. "To base an entire poetics around subject is to enforce
a false-ceiling ― its too limited," he says. Hall is more
interested in the rhythms and patterns that can occur in self-exploration,
which is where the idea of "auto-didacticism" enters into
Hall's poetics. His poetry is constantly about trying to educate ―
not just the reader, but the poet as well ― and he believes
that in order to work on craft, a poet should learn to "listen
more carefully."
Readers
too, should learn to listen more carefully, especially those who walk
into Hall's work with their minds made up, either missing or not comprehending
whole threads of his Ontario gothic tapestry; what makes the language
of work? Responding to an earlier draft of this piece in an email,
Hall himself wrote:
What you say about Lisa Robertson & Tom Wayman
is particularly interesting: the double & work writing etc. The
double as in "Borges Y Yo" that great prose poem. The double
also as in lost twin. Purdy & many other poets have guilt about
surviving a twin in the womb, or in the early years. And the guilt
makes them sing. As the source of my survivor guilt, I have the alternative
me: I was almost named Wayne Aldred. And I was certainly not the son
expected or wanted. To educate yourself out of your class leaves an
extra body-shape with a void. Exile is a hole with your profile. Shame
& Guilt are the names of my two great little speakers, interchangeably
bass & treble. Thus Holly Phillips, my name pulled inside out
like a glove, with the fingers left inside, phillopian tubes. Thus
"a Mandelstam in Guthrie clothing." Thus killdeer &
owl… The split focus. Remember in highschool how you had to scratch
smoked glass twice and peer through to get the right strobe effect?
Those two scratch-lines very close to each other, I see now, were
I's: II. Two I's are better than one. Also, my disillusion with "the
new work writing" (despite my admiration for Tom's poems &
essays) resulted from two issues that gradually niggled. Although
Wayman put a lot of effort into promoting his revelation about work
as the lost subject for poems, I came to understand that it was personality
based, that the subject was his alone ultimately. His converts have
all drifted to their own regions, or stopped writing altogether after
the work anthologies. Poetics-wise, the logic breaks down for me.
To base a poetics on subject. A poem is too "over-determined,"
& its subject is the event of itself. Subject, I have come to
see, is always linked to nostalgia. And nostalgia denies a poem its
"first nation," drains it of current & current-ness,
makes it a secondary event. If "The Oxford Book of English Verse"
is full of secondary events starting with Ballads & Chaucer's
Tales, it seems natural that the Double would appear, first as a storyteller
acting as the mythic character, proceeding and shapechanging all the
way to the dark presence of Lorca's "duende." Perhaps the
Double is the spectre of the denied poem that poets have been pointing
away from (back to events) down through the centuries.
In
the end, Hall keeps two token birds: the killdeer, to distract us,
and the magpie, doubling and teaming up against themselves as Hall
keeps writing his endless collection of Ontario folk-tales, and working
back and forth between himself. In another untitled poem from Forget
Magazine, he references birds again, writing:
I'd like a bird to live on me wouldn’t have to name it
Far from the roots of doors in a grass-skirt—these same glasses
bestirred together (fromgether?) by the landing-breeze of its claws
I'd spill food on myself to feed it—& feeding it would clean me (that might feel
good)
My brain the thumbprint on a window high up I'd not look out from nor in through
again
I'd stand & chew in the grip of its orbit unable to put a face or place to my
name
Works Cited: Barnholden,
Michael and Andrew Klobucar, eds. Writing Class: The Kootenay School
of Writing Anthology. Vancouver BC: New Star Books, 1999. beaulieu,
derek. "Looking outside of Canadian poetry," ffwd weekly,
Volume 11, No. 28. Calgary AB: Thursday, June 22, 2006. Bowering,
George. A Magpie Life: Growing A Writer. Toronto ON: Key Porter
Books, 2001. Butling,
Pauline and Susan Rudy. "'why not be excessive,' a conversation
with Erin Mouré" Poets Talk: Conversations with Robert Kroetsch,
Daphne Marlatt, Erin Mouré, Dionne Brand, Marie Annharte Baker, Jeff
Derksen and Fred Wah. Edmonton AB: University of Alberta Press,
2005. Carey,
Barbara. "Prize Fighters: Sizing up the Griffin Poetry Prize
finalists." Toronto ON: April 7, 2006. www.cbc.ca/arts/books/griffin.html Collis,
Stephen. Phyllis Webb and the Common Good. Vancouver BC: Talonbooks,
2007. Connolly,
Kevin. " Canadian Poetry: The Year in Review," The Third
MacMillan Anthology. Eds. John Metcalf and Kent Thompson. Toronto
ON: Macmillan of Canada, 1990. Dempsey,
Ian. review of The Unsaid, cm magazine, p 182, October
1993. Downie,
Glen. "from Trouble Sleeping," "How Poems Work"
column. The Globe and Mail, Saturday, November 17, 2001, p.
D26. Farr,
Roger. Surplus. Burnaby BC: LINEbooks, 2006. Hall,
Phil. "A poetics essay (rewritten)," Poet's Blog, Griffin
Poetry Prize website, griffinpoetryprize.com/blog/index.php?cat=20 ________.
A Minor Operation. Toronto ON: blewointmentpress, 1983. ________.
An Oak Hunch. London ON: Brick Books, 2005. ________. Amanuensis. London ON: Brick Books,
1989. ________.
A Writer’s Guide To Restaurants. chapbook. Vancouver BC: Flat
Singles Press, 1982. ________.
Eighteen Poems. Mexico City: Cyanamid, 1973; revised. Toronto
ON: Beautiful Outlaw, 2005. ________.
email dated February 3, 2007. ________.
Hearthedral, A Folk-Hermetic. London ON: Brick Books, 1996. ________.
Homes. Windsor ON: Black Moss Press, 1979. ________.
Lamaze Kit. broadside. Toronto ON: The League of Canadian Poets,
. ________
(as Holly Phillips). Les Transparents (after Rene Char). Toronto
ON: Flat Singles Press, 2002. ________.
Old Enemy Juice. Kingston ON : Quarry Press, 1988. ________.
The Bad Sequence. Toronto ON: BookThug, 2004. ________.
The Crucifiction. Flat Singles Press, 1979. ________.
Unison-Light. Flat Singles Press, 1985. ________.
“The Killdeer” New Westminster BC: Event – The Douglas College
Review. Volume 33, Number 1, Summer 2004. ________.
The Unsaid. London ON: Brick Books, 1992. ________.
"Tillsonburg," Shop Talk. Vancouver BC: Pulp Press,
1985. ________.
Trouble Sleeping. London ON: Brick Books, 2000. ________.
Why I Haven’t Written. Ilderton ON: Brick Books, 1985. Hamburger,
Michael. "Introduction," Poems of Paul Celan, trans.
Hamburger. New York NY: Persea books, 1972. Lee,
Dennis, ed. The New Canadian Poets 1970-1985. Toronto ON: McClelland
& Stewart, 1985. Robertson,
Patricia. "A poet's winning season," The Globe and Mail.
Toronto ON: Tuesday, June 27, 2006. Newlove,
John. "Everywhere I Go," 7 Disasters, 3 Theses, and Welcome
Home. Click. 1971. ________.
"Everywhere I Go," Eli Mandel, Ed. Poets of Contemporary
Canada 1960-1970. Toronto ON: McClelland & Stewart, 1972. Norris,
Ken, ed. Canadian Poetry Now: 20 Poets of the '80's. Toronto
ON: Anansi, 1984. Page,
Joanne. "Foreward," Arguments with the World: Essays
by Bronwen Wallace. Kingston ON: Quarry Press, 1992. Pierson,
Ruth Roach. "A Pine Inkling," a review of An Oak Hunch.
Fredericton NB: The Fiddlehead, No. 228, summer 2006. Robertson,
Lisa. "Palinodes," The Chicago Review, 51:4 &
52:1, spring 2006. ________.
The Men. Toronto ON: BookThug, 2006. Suknaski,
Andrew. "Mandel Memoir," Essays on Canadian
Writing, issue
45/46, winter/spring 1991/2. ________.
"out of narayan to bifrost/the word arresting
entropy," Brick magazine, 1980. Vaisius,
Andrew. review of Hearthedral by Phil Hall, The Church Not
Made With Hands by John Terpstra and Zhivago's Fire by
Andrew Wreggitt. Winnipeg MB: Prairie Fire (summer 1998). Wallace,
Bronwen. Common Magic. Ottawa ON: Oberon Press, 1985. Wayman,
Tom. "Split Shift and After: Some Issues of the New Work Writing."
A Country Not Considered: Canada, culture, work. Toronto ON:
Anansi, 1993. ________.
"Introduction: Ground Work." Inside Job: Essays on the
New Work Writing. Madeira Park, BC: Harbour Publishing, 1983. Webb,
Phyllis. Hanging Fire. Toronto ON: Coach House Press, 1990.
|