if I knew more
I'd say less (Trouble Sleeping)
killdeer feigned
splintered then rose
banked & compulsed by otherlove
again & again flopped so
so cold exoneration
if to hatch safe poems alone
& nudge from each a stunt proud
dodo/minion (Hearthedral: A Folk-Hermetic)
In
a recent issue of Event magazine, Toronto poet Phil Hall
wrote about what he calls his "totem bird," the killdeer.
Our national bird, for years, was,
as A.M. Klein said, the rocking chair.
I don’t know what our national bird is now, but my
totem bird is the killdeer. Its names, odd mannerisms and cry
explain a bit about me, but in riddles.
My daily writing self at 50 has accrued the usual
odd habits and noises, of course. There are awful names I know
myself by, lie-dances I perform to avoid work.
In my hopelessness, I half hope my deflections might
honour the Self...
In open fields my shorebird ranges. It nests near
cow plops and hooves. Its only protection is a desperate little
theatre.
If a person or a creature approaches its eggs, the
killdeer pretends to have a broken wing. It flits near, then
hovers away. One wing splints forward at an unnatural angle;
its cry seems so plaintive. Intruders are diverted from the
eggs by a chance at catching the bird.
Like that wounded arrow-maker, Philoctetes, I have
a broken wing of sorts. There is something wrong with my hands.
Eczema? Stigmata? Nerves? My palms, red and dry, split along
the lifelines and bleed. It is hard to wear white shirts, for
instance. My quill-mitts have been like this for years.
In
an interview with Phil Hall in Toronto in 2002, conducted by
Mick Burrs/Steven Michael Berzensky and published on Hall’s
University of Toronto “Canadian Poets” page, their conversation
ends with:
Ph: I’m trying to say what I really feel, which is
not necessarily what I want to be cornered in to saying.
MB: Well, I’m sorry if I’m cornering
you.
Ph: No, no. It’s just that I’m reluctant to speak
about myself and by so doing reveal how important this all is
to me. You know my emblem bird is the kildeer. It shows up often
in my books. The killdeer, by pretending to have a broken wing,
tries to distract and lead away those who come too close to
its eggs. I make stupid jokes, plunk the banjo, tell funny stories.
These distract, they entertain, they lead an audience away from
seeing my eggs, seeing how scared the nest of poetry is to me.
I'm just letting you see the eggs tonight. But my
experience is that if people really see that something is vital
to you, they'll take it away. [Laughs.]
MB: Because you've had that happen to you?
Ph: Yes. But I'm publishing books, so where the hell
can I hide? I have to hide in the open air.
Phil
Hall has been an interesting figure in Canadian poetry over
the past few decades, beginning to publish while in Windsor,
Ontario, where he got his MA, and later coming through the work
tradition in Vancouver around the same time as friend and peer
Erin Mouré, before eventually ending up in Toronto, where he
works as an editor and teacher. Much like Mouré, his poetry
moved further out from the "work poetry" tradition
and into a range of non-linear language, but somehow got far
less attention over the years, despite a flurry of activity,
including the chapbooks Eighteen Poems (1973; revised,
2005), The Crucifiction (1979), A Writer’s Guide To
Restaurants (1982), Unison-Light (1985), The Bad
Sequence (2004) and (as Holly Phillips) Les Transparents
(after René Char) (2002), and trade collections Homes
(1979), A Minor Operation (1983), Why I Haven’t Written
(1985), Old Enemy Juice (1988), Amanuensis (1989),
The Unsaid (1992), Hearthedral, A Folk-Hermetic
(1996), Trouble Sleeping (2000) and An Oak Hunch
(2005), as well as a cassette of labour songs. As he is described
on the poetry spoken here web page of the League of Canadian
Poets:
Phil Hall started out with what has been called,
by Tom Wayman and others, "work writing" ideologically
driven poetry that passionately pursues the experience of ordinary
people in occupations and with preoccupations not often highlighted
or even acknowledged by those in political or literary power.
That is to say, Phil has not turned his back on the outsiderhood
he grew up with. Instead he has made himself a voice ―
often a tough voice ― for the deprived and the marginalized.
At the same time, Hall's writing has been changing over the
years. His poetry has never been marked by the emphasis on mere
content and accessibility that might be expected from a work
writer, but in recent years his language and forms have been
stretching experimentally. He is a writer now wonderfully difficult
to categorize, though he himself has made a stab at joining
the extremes. In a piece from The Unsaid (Brick Books,
1992), he says "I am becoming more hermetic and more populist
at the same time!" That's Osip Mandelstam and Woody Guthrie.
Through
decades of poetry collections, part of an influence on Hall's
writing can be seen from the work of the poet Paul Celan; there
are traces of Erin Mouré, Don McKay and René Char; and even
as Hall has worked decades in the book as the unit of composition,
he has yet to appear properly in a major anthology of Canadian
poets, missing out on Gary Geddes' expansive series of 15
Canadian Poets anthologies, Ken Norris' Canadian Poetry
Now: 20 Poets of the '80's (1984), Dennis Lee's The New
Canadian Poets 1970-1985 (1985), but included in anthologies
of work poetry such as Shop Talk (1985). Ask any writer
who has experienced his work, and they tend on the whole to
admire it greatly. They say timing is everything; he seems not
to have been part of any specific grouping of Canadian poets,
but for his time in Vancouver as part of the Vancouver Industrial
Writers Union, and even as he's been a Brick author for the
past twenty years, he somehow doesn’t properly seem to fit there,
either. It seems interesting that he would consider his emblem
bird the killdeer, suggesting that his own writing works hard
to distract the reader away from what is right in front of them.
It's as though through his poetry collections and refusal, almost,
to place himself, Hall's poetry has been difficult to
place, and difficult to explain, leaving him to slip repeatedly
(even he would say, deliberately) off the radar. Hall could
be considered a variant on the tradition of work poetry that
would also include west coasters Tom Wayman, Kate Braid, Gerald
Creede and Peter Culley, but that wouldn’t properly explain
it either. Writing working class poems in an Ontario gothic
that references physical abuse, geography and writing itself,
it is almost through the shifts that exist from book to book,
Hall works against the reader properly having any sense of his
work that is easy to categorize, which might explain the component
of critical silence on his poetry generally. Through a series
of works honing and altering what he is best at, Hall's poetry
is dangerous and difficult, both in terms of structure and emotional
content. As translator and critic Michael Hamburger once wrote
of the poetry of Paul Celan:
From whatever direction we approach it ― as
plain readers of poetry, as critics or literary historians,
as biographers or sociologists, or as translators ― Paul
Celan's work confronts us with difficulty and paradox. The more
we try to concentrate on the poem itself, on its mode of utterance,
which includes both theme and manner, the more we are made aware
that difficulty and paradox are of its essence. As for "placing"
his work within the body of German imaginative literature after
1945, or against the larger background of international modernism,
all we can be certain of at this point is that it occupies a
prominent, isolated, and anomalous position.
Phil
Hall's poems work the writing by working to alter what the writing
and the process of writing means; through threads
that include his token bird, the killdeer, and childhood abuse,
his long poems work variations on what can also be seen in the
expansive lines of Prince George, British Columbia poet Barry
McKinnon, and the Canadian ghazal brought forth by the late
American expatriate John Thompson.
When we handle things and then write
words
we speak of that interchange of prayers
but when we handle only
pens
we begin to pray to our pens
for words
that are solid
excuses for having to let go ("Pay-Dirt,"
Amanuensis)
Originally
from Bobcaygeon, Ontario (think of the song "Bobcaygeon"
by Blue Rodeo), he moved to Windsor, Ontario in 1972, where
he later published his collection Homes (1979); as the
back cover claims, "This book represents three HOMES: where
I came from, this adopted city, and a Home for the Aged I worked
in for a year. Where I am is always a style bender, so I give
credit to these places for these poems, dwelt in and now rented
to you."
Living in Windsor now
I always go to Rudy's
when I need a haircut.
Why
do you call this
place
Rudy's?
Shut
up and sit down!
But today I've been
thinking about my dad,
how he chokes up over
the phone now, and has
to hang up to spit in
the sink when I say
good-bye.
So I don't go to
Rudy's Hair Salon
but to his kind of place:
Al's Barber Shop.
Do
you cut hair?
Ya.
Will
you cut
this
one? ("Memorial Hall," Homes)
Windsor
is also the place where Hall started publishing chapbooks and
other smaller pieces of ephemera by himself and others under
the name Flat Singles Press, with small pieces produced by Bronwen
Wallace and others, and where he wrote the book A Minor Operation
(1983), being, as he wrote in the front of the book, "posthumours
poems written in 1983. In December 1982 I got a vasectomy. Much
of what's here responds directly or indirectly to that."
Apart from Prince George, British Columbia poet Rob Budde, I
don’t know too many Canadian writers who have written about
getting a vasectomy (the title poem, subtitled "and plotted
perhaps too freely with my life," even includes illustrations).
Hall ends the small book with the title piece, and its own ending,
writing:
So this is the child
of our love for each other
this knowledge
of the operation
the choice we made
in our favour
the dream
we knew we'd forget
so we wrote it down
It unites us
the way a child
might have
but does not threaten
to tear us apart
over money or the right
to be selfish
We want only what's best
for ourselves
In
an interview conducted by Pauline Butling and Susan Rudy in
the collection Poets Talk: Conversations with Robert Kroetsch,
Daphne Marlatt, Erin Mouré, Dionne Brand, Marie Annharte Baker,
Jeff Derksen and Fred Wah (2005), Mouré references her Vancouver
days and Phil Hall, briefly.
Erin: […] I didn't come from a community
were you talked about writing itself. Everybody was writing,
but nobody talked about it in terms of feminism, or in terms
of the workings of language. The only context I had found where
people talked about writing was the Vancouver Industrial Writers
Union, which was full of problems for me.
Pauline: Who belonged to that
group when you were involved with it?
Erin: Tom Wayman, Phil Hall, Kirsten
Emmett and Zoë Landale. At least those people talked a little
about writing, and I worked with Phil Hall and the others to
organize a reading series. Yet the whole orientation of work
poetry and the theory about it all really was problematic for
me. It was populist in a way that seemed to negate things I
wanted to explore.
Part
of the Vancouver Industrial Writers Union, Hall ended up teaching
at the Kootenay School of Writing, back when one of the overlaps
in consideration at the school focused on work writing, given
that the poet Tom Wayman was one of those involved in the early
days. Hall was one of those influenced by the "new work
writing," but not held back by its limitations; consider
the fact that whatever movement they had out west during those
times, apart from Wayman himself, there is almost no one else
left standing; their version of writing work an idea that simply
couldn’t sustain itself. As editors Michael Barnholden and Andrew
Klobucar write in their introduction to Writing Class: The
Kootenay School of Writing Anthology (1999):
"Hammer," an early poem
by Tom Wayman, who was also a Wobbly, illustrates the close
relationship KSW maintained with labour movements. In it, Wayman
symbolically abstracts the common tool of a carpenter ―
the hammer ― into an emblem of social unit among the impoverished
working classes. The image is hardly new, having signified basic
labour in everything from Masonic badges to the flag of the
Soviet Union. What is fresh in Wayman's poem is his descriptive
prose, detailing the various working situations the hammer must
transcend. In the final stanza,
Nothing can stop it. The hammer
has risen for centuries
high as the eaves, over the town.
In this age
it has climbed to the moon
but it does not cease rising everywhere
each hour.
And no one can say what it will
drive
if at last it comes down.
Wayman's interest in class struggle
is evident throughout the poem. All workers, regardless of their
individual working situations, share an important social bond
derived from their common oppression by capitalism. Class oppression
and the need for social change it subsequently provokes unites,
for Wayman, the restaurant cook with the carpenter, and both
of them, oddly enough, with the astronaut. Labour does not ever
cease in this poem; but neither does the need among labourers
for emancipation and their social right to own the relations
of production.
Only one year after KSW opened an
office on West Broadway near Oak Street, the school co-sponsored,
with the Vancouver Industrial Writers Union, a colloquium on
what Wayman and others were calling "work writing."
Among the issues discussed there was labour's unclear future
within a Socred-administered province. Such political uncertainty
generated a specific confusion regarding KSW's own relationship
to conventional labour groups.
The
Split Shift Colloquium of August 1986, called the first North
American symposium of contemporary work literature, included
both Canadians and Americans as participants, such as Phil Hall,
Tom Wayman, Erin Mouré, Antler, Kate Braid, Sandy Shreve, Howard
White, Clemens Starck, Susan Eisenberg, Robert Carson, Jim McLean
and Kirsten Emmott. As Wayman himself wrote of work writing
in his essay, "Split Shift and After: Some Issues of the
New Work Writing":
Work writing, on the other hand,
states that every job has importance in society and that whoever
does that work is an expert concerning the value of this work
and how this work affects individual and community existence.
Therefore each of us has the right to speak out and be listened
to, irrespective of financial status. The present educational
and critical apparatus is not likely to devote a sustained effort
to promoting this message.
Whatever
statements on poetry and poetics that Hall himself has made
over the years have been shifted and even circumvented as poems
slipped into various of his own collections, echoing what writers
like Erin Mouré and bpNichol (and since, nathalie stephens and
Margaret Christakos) have done, merging poetry and poetics as
opposed to keeping them separate. Prince George, British Columbia
poet Barry McKinnon has also written a number of prose/critical
pieces that suddenly shape themselves into poems, almost as
though the poem itself, as for Hall, is his best thinking
form. The piece "Inner Handles," for example, that
exists in the collection The Unsaid, was revised from
Hall's own statement of purpose written for the Split Shift
Colloquium, that begins:
I have this recurring dream of swallowing
the dagger that figures
in one of Borges' stories.
Its blade comes out my stomach, and
its handle remains inside ―
opposite of how a blade lodges in combat.
Then I fall, stabbing my shadow and
its earth. The point enters
its counterpoint.
This is a poetic dream of process and
intent.
Each of my poems is a fortress built
for a party. How entrancing
the melodies of opposition to self
can be! How useful the poems
that leave all their handles inside!
Useful: the lathe inside grinding out hopefully elegant
tools.
Having a grip on the handle inside me allows me to
love the
details of this world, each gimcrack/talis-shard.
Obviously
Hall is mentioning Borges; is this another deflection? Is this
another wounded wing? The piece seems instead to echo the language
of a John Newlove poem that originally appeared in 7 Disasters,
3 Theses, and Welcome Home. Click (1971) (Newlove is mentioned
as an influence, briefly, in An Oak Hunch):
Everywhere I Go
What are people talking about. Everywhere
I go they whisper.
They stick their eyes at me, right
at the base of the breastbone,
when I'm not looking.
The breastbone seems flat, pointed
like a dagger to the top of my
stomach.
O, my stomach, my stomach…when the
knife rips you open it will
find coffee and four strips of bacon,
pieces of chewed beard and a
handwritten note saying I have left
town forever again.
Another
of Hall's pieces from the same collection, "Tillsonburg,"
first appeared as an author's statement for the Vancouver Industrial
Writers' Union anthology Shop Talk (1985).
Tillsonburg
Stompin' Tom, in his song about tobacco
picking, mentions a
town in southern Ontario, Tillsonburg,
and then says, 'My back
still breaks when I hear that word.'
I understand his relationship between
health, place, work and
language. Some words are that mighty,
that crippling. Certain
place-names, if uttered, cause asthma.
Mention a mere file code
number and certain people will stick
their fingers down their
throats.
I write to cure myself of regionalism,
to break free from Ontario's
plated dolour. I write for personal
and political revenge. Spite,
given form, allows me to stand upright
and scan this field,
wheezing. Allows spitelessness, music,
humour.
I mean each poem/word to be useful,
not clever. As practical as if
found on a map. As if I had gone there,
worked there, been
broken, quit and come back. As if you
could go there and find a
better job than I did.
My simple anarchy mistrusts even tools,
and so I mean to grasp
Hopelessness with my bare hands, pull
it out of the ground, and
set it on fire in my mouth.
My goal is joy. Joy. But my back still
breaks when I hear that
word.
Where
is Hall placing himself and his own poetic? It's as though Hall
has to remove himself "from Ontario's / plated dolour."
so he can return to it, and even reclaim it later on, in the
poems that make up his 2005 collection An Oak Hunch (but
more of that later on). Hall's aesthetic can certainly be considered
shaped by "work poetry," even as a point of foundation
to what he has done throughout his career, but by itself is
only a part of something else, and would ignore whole swaths
of other threads throughout his work. Put alongside Erin Mouré,
who came through Vancouver writing "work poetry" while
a station manager at VIA Rail, and also moved out from there
into more experimental forms, Hall's poetry seems more experimental
than the work poets, but less overtly so than the poetry of
Mouré. Hall's writing process reads like a hammer (his plainspeak
and/or experimental leanings) taken to glass (his working class
aversion to preciousness), before deft hands carefully and deliberately
re-assemble the pieces into collage.
For
many years, the working class plain-speech of the "work
poetry" traditions in Canada seemed to go against the traditions
and explorations of any more formally experimental works. I
don’t know if Wayman still holds to this opinion (which reads
as painfully oppositional), but in another essay years
earlier he referenced experimental writing against a larger
piece on "work poetry," suggesting that
Experimental writing has its own
social consequences, however. Formal experimentation (that is,
experiments involving artistic form) has increased during
the past three-quarters of a century to become what many artists
now practicing think art is supposed to be about. Formal experimentation,
be it "new music" or "abstract expressionism",
is art about art. And that means an end of a critique of society
in art.
The
thing Wayman doesn’t seem to understand, insofar as this quote,
is the very argument between the modernists and the post-modernists,
with the former creating art to change the world, separate from
and working to represent the world, and the latter creating
art that includes the world, referencing the world from the
inside. What Wayman doesn’t seem to understand (or at least,
when he wrote the piece) is that postmodernism is more interested
in the questions than it is in authority, and
that it is the language itself that is political, and
by itself can be used as a critique of society, such
as the work of west coast poets Jeff Derksen (one of the original
members of the Kootenay School of Writing), Dorothy Trujillo
Lusk and Peter Culley, who very much work out of both the traditions
of "work poetry" and avant-garde formal experimentation
(think, too, of the political poems of the late American poet
Edward Dorn). Even further, has been some of the work done by
Vancouver poet Roger Farr in his collection Surplus (2006),
writing both regular speech, writing theory, working class values
and social action, bringing the two halves of the original Kootenay
School of Writing back together in ways they haven’t been in
decades, and expanding something rich and rare in the considerations
of Canadian poetry that have been barely understood, let alone
acknowledged.
It
would seem that Hall's consideration of "work poetry"
might fall somewhere in-between Wayman's aesthetics and the
aesthetics of the late Kingston poet Bronwen Wallace (Hall was
one of her early supporters, during the time they lived as neighbours
in the same apartment building in Windsor, Ontario). Kingston
poet Joanne Page, editor of Wallace's posthumous collection
of essays, Arguments with the World, wrote in the forward
that
Attaching people, weaving them together
was Bronwen's great delight. Much was sheer Bronwen: generosity,
scarves and earrings, curves, outrage, curiosity, gardens. And
just as distinctive was her sense of place, or "location,"
to use her term. By location she meant home, the center, a roof
over the heart. She loved the implications of home, how it was
more than shelter, how it mixed family history, daily life,
friends, chili sauce recipes, the patches of earth that are
peculiar to each of us. Bronwen located herself in the hardscrabble
farms and lakes of southeastern Ontario, identifying herself
with her grandmother's runaway horse, tears on a friend's cheeks,
her father's Sunday grace, lemon balm and green tomatoes, Jeremy's
bike, an Emmylou Harris song, her mother's stories. She anchored
herself in this commotion of past and present. Her territory,
in writing as in life, was like the eastern Ontario landscape
she loved so well — the immutable realities that lie like bedrock
beneath the ordinary dailiness of life.
As
Page writes, the "anchoring" of daily life. As Hall
wrote in Amanuensis (1989), writing so many of his concerns
together in a poem that probably isn’t about ironing, writing:
Naked
Ironing my white shirt
before another reading
pressing weight water and volts
against every crease
thinking of what I'll read
insecure doubtful memories
Mom from cuff to shoulder
to cuff pushing a hot
toy boat
Dad directing traffic
at the Kinmount Fair
shouting
drunk and rolling up
his sleeves
Pressing my white shirt smooth
the way she taught me knowing
I'll roll up my sleeves
Ironing the only crumpled page
I brought to wear
Any
larger concerns of the Canadian avant-garde in poetry often
fall into either a geographic area or a series of stylistic
groupings; Hall seems to be one of a series of individual Canadian
poets whose work can't easily be placed in any sort of grouping
or avant-garde "movements" (whether what Bowering
once referred to as the "Calgary renaissance," or
the groupings around the current and past versions of the Kootenay
School of Writing in Vancouver and Coach House Press and/or
Coach House Books in Toronto…) ― Sylvia Legris in Saskatoon,
Erin Mouré in Montreal, nathalie stephens in Chicago, Judith
Fitzgerald in northern Ontario, and Stan Rogal in Toronto ―
leaving many of them misunderstood, and, much of the time, critically
out in the cold. The fact that Hall seeks very little attention
certainly helps; it's almost as though he has spent a concerted
effort in keeping his head down, what with very little written
on Hall and his work over the years (although the fact that
An Oak Hunch appeared on the Griffin Prize shortlist
might perhaps see a change in perception). Are these critical
failures a sign of Hall, or a sign of the times?
What
seems interesting in the response Hall predominantly gets for
his poetry, working the seeming contradictions of language and
work, those who might know more from the work side don't seem
to comprehend the other, and even see his movements combining
them as some sort of poetic failure; they seem to like the work
well enough but don’t entirely comprehend it. Is this a failure
of the poet or the critic? As northern British Columbia poet
and critic Don Precosky wrote as his rather harsh review of
the collection Amanuensis in Literature and Language:
This is a thin book of wan poems. The author displays
some wit and skill at word play, but he does not get much beyond
the surface. The postmodernist talk about "writing"
and "language" with which the book starts was fresh
10 years ago but is now getting stale. Furthermore, it is more
convincing when it comes from poets who are doing a good job.
Later
on in another issue of Literature and Language, a review
James Deahl wrote of the collection Hearthedral: A Folk-Hermetic:
Although the title of this collection evokes Hermes
Trismegistus and such concerns as gnosticism, alchemy, and magic,
the actual poems are awash in existential angst and pessimism.
Hall is well versed in "the terrible punishments of humans
inflicted upon humans" (to quote Erin Mouré), and his book
is full of historical reminders of how brutish life can be.
In Hall's poetic universe, the Judeo-Christian tradition, secular
humanism, and social activism are all spiritually bankrupt,
while death is the ultimate release from suffering.
Hearthedral
does break new ground in its use of language. However, its vision
is unlikely to appeal to readers who like their despair in modest
doses.
How
does he get treated so badly so often? In so many ways, Hall's
token bird could as easily be the magpie, something Vancouver
writer George Bowering has suggested of himself through his
memoir, A Magpie Life: Growing A Writer (2001). It's
as though Hall's poetry is continually picking up objects and
placing them carefully in what end up being complete poems in
complete books; far more than a collage than a significant whole.
What has the magpie Hall picked up from his father? What has
the magpie Hall picked up from other books he has read, scattered
throughout his own texts? Is this the distraction the killdeer
is there to prevent, to keep the reader from seeing just how
much Hall has collected? In the collection Why I Haven't
Written (1985), Hall writes:
Each one of us is two stupid birds,
our hands in our armpits, our faces
moronic.
Or
later on, in the poem "English" from the collection
Amanuensis, he writes:
Such foolishness as that, and more,
but really
looking into your eyes' clear tan speckles
and shards
I feel my upper-lip and eye-lids tug
hairward
I am leaning that far out and down
to see
wobble-lights in a purple current
pass under me this bridge
that is moving
this doomed London bridge
to which all my self-portraits are
moored
Moving
from bird to bird, from son to father, from self-portrait to
something other, it's as though Hall is working the idea of
the double while using one to distract you from the other. What
is it he doesn't want you to see? Is this what the reference
to Borges means, with Hall locating his own self in the double,
whether pseudonimously (as Holly Phillips) or two birds? Vancouver
poet Lisa Robertson has worked with the double as well, such
as in her long poem "Palinodes" from The Chicago
Review, where she writes:
Suppose I never saw deception
No distinctions—just the fear of isolation
That structure was not finally my medium
I am an animal I don’t know
Nor an orchard nor a single soul nor
A dog nor a leather purse nor subjection
Nor trivialization nor worthlessness
Nor apples and stars when the festival
Of war unfurls from garden suburbs and
Decks the patios in grand coloured
Swags flipping upwards in the breeze bringing
The shampoo scent of blossoms
It would be nice
To interfere with the accuracy of the world.
It
seems interesting she would mention "the double" in
a subsequent piece on the poem, included in the same issue ("There
is a doubled sensation."). In her collection The Men
(2006), too, there is the talk of the double, moving regularly
from the "I" into "we" and vice versa. There
is the collective and then there is the individual, as she writes
in the poem "MEN DEFT MEN" from the same collection:
We are weary in the watching.
I am.
What
is this double-speak she speaks of? What is this kind of doubling?
Writing herself as herself, writing herself as man, writing
herself as the men. Writing herself or writing narrator. It
was something prairie poet Andrew Suknaski wrote of again and
again, predominantly when referring to Eli Mandel (and therefore,
Borges) in various of his critical pieces, writing:
No, it isn't just the prairie
that drove some of us mad. It was the mutants in the lineage.
Shakespeare taught us that. Borges reaffirmed it in a healthy
obsession with doubles: Christ/Judas; Cain/Abel; Othello/Iago
and others — fleshed-out binaries of the tormented, human mind.
No, it ain't easy to follow Mandel.
Or writing:
Eli, as I began to pass
the Bergman Apartments, your words faded in that coldest of
all cold nights I'd ever known. I didn't look right to what
had once been your window. I did remember, again, how you once
talked of seeing your double at the Cave n' Basin Hot Spring
that one summer. I think it was about then — as I looked back
once at the place that once doubled for home to you — that your
dead ringer began to peel my name off the cold aluminum sky
illuminated by the city's light: "Andyyy! Andyyyyyyy! Stop!
Don't do it!" It didn't stop me. What actually slowed my
pace were the faint words of a woman I once loved. Miraculously,
her words surfaced again in my memory: "Andy, whenever
I thought of you somewhere, I imagined this Towering Spirit
moving across the Prairie . . . ." I stopped one block
past the Bergman Apartments. Abandoned my premeditated long
walk east across Wascana Lake where I might have confirmed the
word with flesh. ("Mandel Memoir")
Does
this all come back to Borges? For Phil Hall, in a collection
rife with considerations of the father, the title poem to Why
I Haven't Written seems deflection again (writing "You
failed me" to an unnamed woman), a distraction against
writing slowly about his late father in ways that he couldn’t
have previously, writing their relationship as awkward and seriously
flawed, and him as a gentle man, as in the poem of the same
name. In later collections, the mentions of the father become
more full, of that quiet, rural Ontario man who knew little
of conversation but much about guns and the land; the father
Hall knows he is different from, but afraid of becoming. Is
that where his double is held? Or at least one of them?
A Gentle Man
My father killed everything
he could get his hands on.
As a gentle man he made
such a fool of himself.
The old paddle he shellacked
after painting, looked stupid:
little teepees, a tree. The man
was vain about his trees.
I hated to see him, retired,
at his work-bench in the shed;
he was putting tiny white beads
on the front sights of his rifles
to help him see.
The only thing he did beautifully
after that, was die. It seemed so brave,
or selfish, the way he asked for water,
then quit breathing the moment
he was alone.
It
was as though from Homes on, Hall was writing writing
and fathers and mothers and what else that would come from there
and through to the late 1980s, from a construction of individual
poems and more into fragments of a larger, more ongoing poetry;
writing so many of the concerns of "work poetry" and
rural Ontario ideas and ideals, and writing out parts of his
life in small fragments. It was as though from Homes
on, Hall too writing further and further away from what poems
were "supposed" to have looked like, as in this fragment
of the poem "Mould," from the collection Why I
Haven't Written:
Now I haunt the second-hand bookstores,
loving the smell of old, terrible books:
The Little
Lame Prince, Penny
Nichols, Freddy The Pig And
The Baseball Team From
Mars…The
poor children
who read those books now, who take
them home
broken from the Salvation Army, are
receiving, as
I did, slammed-shut concessions to
working class
hope. They are eating what there is
to eat: the blue
and green moulds that grow on silence.
I am allergic to mould. The doctors want to
inject me with phrase-sized solutions
of mould till I
develop immunity. Having scratched
through that
wall with The Count Of Monte Cristo,
having
sucked on the same smooth stone of
revenge, I
avoid medicine the way my ancestors
probably
tried to avoid the plague.
It
was in the 1980s, too, that Phil Hall started getting further
attention for his writing, and when he was slowly coming into
his own, as in the piece "Canadian Poetry: The Year in
Review" in The Third Macmillan Anthology, where
Toronto poet and critic Kevin Connolly wrote:
Phil Hall's eighth book, Old
Enemy Juice, struck me as a breakthrough for a poet whose
style and subject matter has attracted me, but who has always
seemed to overplay his textual persona, that of the gritty,
blue-collar moralist. In Old Enemy Juice Hall focuses
on the overwhelming negative power of societal concepts of manhood
as they are handed down from father to son and acted out in
subsequent relationships. Hall uses his own life failures and
unwelcome patriarchal inheritance as the material here, and
while the slant is political, the poems themselves are particular
and personal. One of the strengths of this book is that it does
not assume a clear conscience on the part of the speaker; it
refuses to oversimplify the issue of abusive male behavior.
There are poems which deal explicitly with physical and mental
abuse, but even more powerful are those which focus on the subtler
effects of the masculine myth—on apparently healthy relationships,
on the motivations of the writer, on language itself. Editing
help from the late Bronwen Wallace may have been instrumental
in harnessing Hall's intense and unusual talents. In any case,
the result is easily Hall's best effort and a book well worth
tracking down.
Old Enemy Juice is Hall's last collection of individual poems, but there
still seems an overlap of construction, and is probably his
most effective collection and single unit of composition up
to that point. Hall's work shows a strange and refreshing kind
of vulnerability; strange not just for him being Ontario rural
male, but being human at all, and that kind of vulnerability
becomes very honest and refreshing; the things held back in
Hall's writing are those things held only because it is necessary
to, whether for the sake of himself or for the poem.
His teeth marks convicted him
as this old story does me
An 8-page rape fantasy
I had forgotten
Wrote it 10 years ago
and am shocked by what I unearth
Am forced to face another of my names
It means mysogeny, mass murder
Ted Bundy is one of my names
I must answer to, but am trying to
change
By an invocation of others
I gladly go by ("Ted Bundy")
Writing,
as he says, another of his many names; is there more here than
doubling? There is something about the erratum held in at the
beginning of the collection I don’t believe is there accidentally,
working a way his further writing plays; writing error as deliberate,
echoing Phyllis Webb's notion of "failure."
ERRATUM
I can't keep the cockroaches
out of my cupboards, the morbid doubts
out of my head, the typos
out of my books — nor can you —
The only perfect things I can think
of
are dead and untrue:
acknowledgements: Rick Johnston
read Johnson
contents: What Times Does to Salads
read What
Time Does
p. 20: right lights read rich
lights
p. 46: and the guilt read quilt
p. 75: build as air read us
air
p. 77: writing with convulsions
read writhing
What
is it about failure that attracts? Every poet, Hall has even
said, should have a book that fails (and some poets are lucky
enough to have more than one); at least for Hall, this is as
far away from actual failure as one gets. As Brian Vanderlip
writes of the collection in Poetry Canada Chronicle (Vol.
10, No. 4):
Phil Hall's eighth collection of poetry begins warmly,
with a quiet intensity. Hall is not exactly an intellectual
poet, more an emotional vision masked in intellect, injured
by memory: "The crumpled paper/ cup of my longing still/
floats// But will not hold us/ both." Still, his heart
reaches out in hope: "We must not enter/ or encircle each
other/ with that crude arsenal of words we know/ are against
us…" This poet doesn’t have a fantasy sunset for lovers
to disappear in; he's world-wise. But he does offer a vision
of shared humanity that enfolds both the positive and negative
capabilities of humankind, the need to realize our capacity
for choice. Not only does Hall allow for the most negative of
possibilities, he relates very strongly and personally to them.
In the poems "Heart and Anchor" and "Ted Bundy,"
Hall stands beside those criminals we often view as the embodiment
of utter evil in our world, the pedophile and the mass-murderer.
He calls the pedophile his brother and notes that they look
so much like each other. There is no hope in a merely us/them
perspective. The possibilities for love come from compassion
in the midst of our own experiences: "…a triumphant culmination/
of all that old caring/ we did less well."
The
second of three sections, "The War In Ontario," focuses
primarily on Hall's blood family, especially his strained, bitter
memories of his father and the knowledge that in so many ways
he and his father are inseparable: "I write of killing
him/ and find him only alive in myself…" This is the most
powerfully conceived section of the book and the darkest in
tone. In one of the best stanzas Hall juxtaposes his memory
of a mean, distant father with verses describing the behaviour
of a mother bear's cubs after she has died, the cubs "(tearing
her) apart in rage and hunger." He often acknowledges this
tremendous power of experience and memory, as in a lovely lament
in the third part of "The War In Ontario:" "How
many times on a bus or a train/ have I looked out at those fields/
I hate/ and seen them slowly become/ myself reflected in the
moving window/ till morning?"
The
final section of the book is the least cohesive, but does include
some strong poetry: "Swoop," "Life Support System,"
"The Holes In Trees," to name a few. Following the
dark strength of the father poems, these pieces seem to lack
as strong a focus, not coming together enough to deal with earlier
elements. Is the hope of strength through sharing ("Correlations,"
"Uttering The Chestnut," "Facing") reduced
in the end to only "…a tradition of resistance?" Are
Hall's songs finally destined to come from "…a scrapper…
his songs up like gloves?" I think not: stay tuned.
There
is something about his following poetry collection, the book
Amanuensis (1989), with its array of fantastic gestures
and fine lines, that somehow doesn’t hold together as a single
unit in the same kind of way; a small book with such a potential
that it doesn’t quite reach, but rife with echoes of what work
had come before, and was still to come, talking about fathers,
writing and the killdeer. The collection reads as both a continuation
and progression of previous work, and an introduction into further
openings, such as the double of the two men in Trouble Sleeping.
As he writes again of his token bird in the final poem-fragment
of Amanuensis:
*
Killdeer
there isn’t much to say
just here I am
here I am
Another waving
of old tools
as if they were broken
wings
A thin plea
my pain my pain
Lies dying out in the dry grass
dying out in starlessness –
A few small poems
have stayed warm ("To Be More
Round")
After
so much deflection, it seems interesting that Hall would talk
about a kind of clarity surrounding his place, writing "here
I am / here I am," and in bold, no less, seriously highlighting
what otherwise we might have passed over too quickly. The bird
itself is famous for the broken-wing display, to lead someone
further and further from the hidden nest of killdeer young;
building their nests in open areas, distraction is the entire
point. In the title poem of The Unsaid, writing:
Praise her curse this weight
of thought ― killdeer brain shovel
In
a short review of Amanuensis in Books in Canada,
Erin Mouré wrote:
AS IT IS: dense, compact, elliptic,
fierce, without evasion.
Then they put our cages on wheels
and let us (stinking of snacks) push
them—
we push them out of their parking-lots
into fields of wild carrot and chicory
but they always find them and drag
them back
shove each cage into the muzzle of
the next
cage.
In Amanuensis (Brick, 64 pages, unpriced),
Phil Hall has come, by strife with words and their embedded
values, to a technique of compression that reminds of Paul Celan's
knotted poems; they beam straight through the skull. So that:
"It is a lark drinking rain-water from a sun-dial"
and "oat-dust gold along the snout-beam." Poetry that
recalls the organs of the body, that invents and compounds verbs,
nouns, and adjectives to reach toward what cannot be spoken,
without censoring our hands' flutter. It is poetry that "has
been taught mockingbirds well." Which is why, perhaps,
Hall's work has been little recognized by those grocers who
are so invested in the cages and parking lots of the literary
supermarket. Never mind. It is recognized by those who want,
instead of supermarkets, food.
His
subsequent trade collection The Unsaid (1992), on the
other hand, returns to that sense of solid form that makes up
a collection by Phil Hall—a single unit out of a series of disparate
forms, including the title poem, made up of twenty-five numbered
sections writing rape and violence and accidents of beauty,
writing out of labour songs and Woody Guthrie echoes. In The
Unsaid, Phil Hall saying what he previously couldn’t but
so long worked toward, and somehow, finally did. In a review
of The Unsaid in cm, Cambridge, Ontario teacher-librarian
Ian Dempsey wrote:
In one of Phil Hall's poems in The
Unsaid, he admits that he is writing to cure himself of
regionalism. The author is literary editor for This Magazine
and is editor of Don't Quit Yr Day-Job, a "labour-arts
literary magazine."
Hall grew up in the rough landscape
of the Canadian Shield under rough conditions, his father
slinging beer at night
fixing & dealing old cars on
the side
bootlegging at Curve Lake.
From this existence Hall ran "full tilt into
books." He became a "Mandelstam in Guthrie clothing,"
the classical Russian poet representing his inner compulsion
for pure art, and the American folk-singer and activist being
the link to the common, working life.
This
schizophrenia is embarrassing at times in his poems, that is,
it stops us from entering easily into his experiences. His poems
lack the precision and grace of a classical expression, and
only a few have the simple directness of popular pieces.
One
wonders how some of these poems would be greeted by the auto
workers in Windsor, for whom he conducted creative workshops
at one time. The poems are often dense and tricky, like the
brush trails in his native Haliburton. There are references
to many poets and artists, bits in italics, experimental blips,
images that do not complete themselves. For the poet, these
may be the glimpses of sky, the far-off vistas that will lift
him out of his childhood losses. More of Guthrie would have
worked for all readers, sophisticated and simple, and had us
singing along.
That
"Mandelstam in Guthrie clothing" becomes a kind of
umbrella mantra for all of Hall's ouvre, writing out "pure
art" against a "common, writing life" but not
out of any sense of schizophrenia, but instead a sense of complimentary
movements; how can one claim that there isn’t pure art to be
found in common music? Bronwen Wallace knew, and wrote a whole
collection of Common Magic (1985), writing her own domestic
and common moments into the essential poems about living, or
Hall himself, in the title poem of The Unsaid, writing:
When I have dedicated myself
to silences & death again
when I look at my hands
& think instruments of hopelessness
then I force my thumbs into my belt-lops
& think about Woody Guthrie
in his last years of Huntington's Chorea
thumbs hooked into his belt-loops
by attendants
so his hands wouldn’t strum in wide
arcs
& break against corridor walls
I walk his derailed impulses
& try to engender within myself
his humour & conviction
I listen to him until I regain
my love of the complex squabble
between biology & gravity
all our old pre-legal hankerings for
justice
solidarity with the inanimate
For
all of Hall's silences, the books themselves contradict those
same silences, as Phyllis Webb has written of her own from the
collection Hanging Fire (1990), "There Are
the Poems," or critic Stephen Collis writing of Webb in
his Phyllis Webb and the Common Good (2007), writing
"Poetry is language that we notice. That is one place to
begin." What is it about recluses, whether accidental or
deliberate (see also: John Newlove) that make us want what we
can't have? Webb writes in her piece almost accusatory (even
as she deflects to "Sharon," possibly "Thesen"):
There Are the
Poems
An editor asks me to put it all down: the reasons
I write. And I thought 'it' was a gift. Homo ludens at play
among the killing fields of dry grasses. Playful woman making
a space to breathe. 'There are the poems,' Sharon says,
she means, between the critical flash. There are the
poems, like fists wearing birthstones and bracelets, her 'roses
& bliss'. Or they're like legs running, bounding over the
fields of force, momentum, for a quick roll in Darwin's tangled
bank. And there are the poets doing what? And why, the editor
asks. What does he want? Contributions to knowledge? Civilization
and its discontents? Chaos among the order ― or, oh yes,
french doors opening onto a deck and a small pool where we can
watch our weird reflections shimmering and insubstantial? The
proper response to a poem is another poem. We burrow into the
paper to court in secret the life of plants, the shifty moon's
space-walks, the bliss, the roses, the glamorous national debt.
Someone to talk to, for God's sake, something to love that will
never hit back.
Or
Hall again in his own poem "A Mandelstam in Guthrie Clothing,"
writing
All an education's gotten me is distance
and vocabulary enough to
(maybe) be precise about what haunts.
Storyless, how to proceed? Pastiche
is not a procedural heritage of
my class background. Nor is dialectical
spoofing.
No pastiche, then. No goofing on voices
like or unlike my own.
Symbols?
'When your Dad says money he means
another old car on its side
in the yard,' Mom said, & so I'm
reluctant to use symbols,
because, equated with lies, they are
not the story or its excuse.
Something happened, though. (Always
does.)
I ran. Full tilt into books. The forest
they are; the city they are.
The me-not-home they are. The me at
40 they are becoming
as dreaming at lucid dawn I hear (last
month) an internal critic
refer to me as 'a Mandelstam in Guthrie
clothing.' (Osip, of
course; Woody, of course ― my
durable, unlikely godparents.) I see
what that inner-critic means:
I am becoming more hermetic and more
populist at the same
time!
Here
he writes a precursor to his "folk-hermetic," writing
statements as poetics as poems in a collection rife with such,
hidden there as poems, much like the Phyllis Webb piece. What
does he keep hiding, or is he in plain view the entire time?
The complex structure of Hall's Hearthedral: A Folk-Hermetic
(1996) opens with a number of pieces, including “You will
know when the poem begins / but reading shan’t accomplish
this alone” and the page preceding, writing:
from willseed sprout
hearthedral
(Huckleberry gargoyle
Blind Pew vaulted archway
Micawbered buttress)
above ladders chamois
circling inlaid domes
ungonged firebells
empty pews
blank hymnals
this mortarsinew chorus
will succeed
The
most overtly structurally complex of his collections, the book
has a number of openings, introductions and starts, but the
first page before the first section is where the real poem begins,
as in his “Introductory,” writing:
Iroquois, etc. &
Steam, etc.: these lists are borrowed from ‘Spadina
Line,’ a
public-art installation by Brad Golden
and Norman Richards. Comprised of
‘switch-post’ lights & metal words,
this work runs along Spadina Avenue
north of Dupont Road in Toronto. (We
must, of course, credit Golden &
Richards with the intrinsic poetry
that exists in the lists themselves.)
An official
lamp lighting ceremony for the installation took place on
September 21, 1991.
These lists suggest developments from wild to rural to urban
Ontario
land; they also echo the small, long-gone
railways that used to service
mining towns & villages to the
north.
In this poem these lists accrue parallel, private words &
meanings from
wild to rural to urban, and in so doing
become word-girders for a catheral
of low sorts.
A funeral is underway: the will has died. Pipes play the pibroch.
As David Jones says in his introduction to The Anathemata:
‘to make a
shape out of the very things of which
one is oneself made.’
Canada is also dead. When nationhood is lost without resistance,
hermetic & idiosyncratic chapels
of selfhood may still be worthy of defence
and maintenance – toward (however covert
and puny) some other
uncompromiseable community.
Built of hearth units between list pages, and culminating in
central spires
of longtall parts, this poem aspires
to a structure – a possible section scheme
of which is:
^
7
7
6
6
5 5
5 5
4 4 4
4 4 4
3 3 3
3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2 2
0 0 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0
Thanks to the City of Toronto Archives,
Phil Hall, Cabbagetown, 1992-1996
The
collection works a wonderful interplay not just with writing
but with reading, quoting not just lines and works from authors,
but their characters as well. It even elicits a response from
Richmond, British Columbia high school librarian Willa Walsh,
in her review published in the Manitoba Library Association
publication cm (Volume 5, No. 2), writing:
This collection of poems would be largely inaccessible
to most high school students. The strange vocabulary, with the
intentionally misspelled words and combinations of words would
need an extensive glossary to illuminate the meaning. It is
similar to reading Joyce’s Finnegan’s Wake. Newly coined
words, such as “squalled furbs” and “helexi” (p. 95), abtruse
metaphors, esoteric references and obscure diagrams, along with
cryptic bits of word-poems, add to the complexity.
Some poems are more explicit (p. 25). Some are very
funny with their unexpected comments on life, e.g. “cakewalking
thru’ the universe” (p. 42) and “the optimism of AM radio” (p.
55). Many are irreverent and graphic. Words are thrown together
like a collage or arranged in lists - juxtaposed to give meaning
or perhaps, no meaning. These are adult poems and require sophisticated
readers. “whatever words meant has filigreed & transmuted”
(p. 83). So true!
An
interesting, if skewered, response to Hall's writing, she actually
touches on a number of strengths of the collection, even if
she considers them weaknesses; comparing the collection to James
Joyce, for example, as a bad thing, and suggesting that
the text needs a glossary. Is the notion of art supposed to
include how quickly a disinterested high school student can
enter? Hall's is a poetry that has the reader learning as the
writer does, moving through his exploration of the world, through
what is going on inside him, in the larger world, and through
the language itself. You can't provide shortcuts for that. Otherwise,
Andrew Vaisius seemed to have a much better time in the collection,
writing his review of the collection as part of a triple-book
review in an issue Prairie Fire (summer 1998):
Almost from his first lines Phil
Hall insists on a revaluation of words and the community of
words we know as language. "[T]his mortarsinew chorus /
will succeed" of the introduction merges into a "mortarsinew
chorused" at the conclusion, and this collective future
grows in the sprouting, bifurcation and uplifting of those willseeds
we recognise in our Hearthedral—the heart, hearth, echo of cathedral
and vestige of the geometric hedral of the title supply the
internal warmth—mortared with the Amy Coshes, Schlomo Goldhabers,
bluegrass pickers and others whom Hall pens in order to speak
for us in individual voices stripped of self-serving and manufacture.
His poems may protest ("living ministries," "to
evoke Amy Cosh") but they are not polemics. Hall is busy
creating a new context with his hard packed lines, his word
blends, puns and plays, and his radiant imagery. This is fortifying,
and sometimes gloomy, writing (if only to remind us that gloom
is being human, too). It is writing brave enough to encounter
despair and walk away piping a pibroch of enlightenment about
our common ground of joys and sorrows. I hear F.R. Scott's wise
poem "Dancing" in Hall's own take on parenthood, playing
a balance game with his young daughter:
I am walking on the thread of my
daughter's safety
faltering as I proceed
……………………………………………………
if she falls into the net her eyes
will open
to the dangers of the net
if I close my eyes & dance will
I ever find her?
Some lines are lambswool in pointe shoes: "I
who am a mess & a failure / at everything words refer to
// believe in absolution / by exactitude of usage," and
"hope is work do not be ashamed"; while others are
the gravelled shoulder of the Transcanada Highway: "nailzedded
barnboards / on white grass & cutworms" and "their
deaths bequeath dilapidated pride & vacuity / ― a
dustball compost for my credence / who was not born to serve
hands-on silently." Hearthedral is a dowsing and
a drilling and a cold uprushing from depths—it's a masterwork
by an accomplished poet.
His
collection Trouble Sleeping (2000), which was short-listed
for the Governor General's Award for Poetry, is written as a
haibun (a Japanese form of interwoven journey-prose and poetry),
a form worked previously by such Canadian poets as Fred Wah,
bpNichol and Roy Kiyooka, but used by Hall as a single long
poem very specifically talking about family, fathers and sexual
abuse during his childhood in Bobcaygeon; writing his roughneck
past as rural Ontario "white trash." Unlike the long
poems of McKinnon, which work up to a central line in the first
half of the piece and then away from that line, Hall's Trouble
Sleeping works up to its ending, writing as its final two
lines "If I knew more / I'd say less" at the end of
a two-page closer that also includes another echo of the double,
writing:
the whole story is not my father
always threatening
to disappear up lumber
trails
that lead to a khaki Trenton
findable only two fingers
at a time
until tracheotomy sprung him
[…]
narrative won't solve this
piecemeal din
that is not 'archivally sound'
nor democratic
[…]
the whole story is not just mine
to unearth by pageantry ― is a multiple
common held in trust ― is what
be/longs
us
[…]
& the silence between the versions
is where the reverence holds
The
story is not just the beginning, but how it's played out, and
how the story continues to be written through his combination
of tellings, under- and over-telling, providing an unrelenting
tension that holds the whole book as a single piece; in poems
that struggle through variations of Hall's central concerns
of the individual "I" walking through a series of
personal histories, high art merged with the common folk song,
and the capacities of violence, whether physical, emotional
or sexual. In a review of Trouble Sleeping in The
Antigonish Review (No. 127), Crystal Bacon writes:
Like many novels, Hall’s haibun happens as
much in the interstices between pieces as it does in the writing
itself. It requires a suspension of disbelief, a trust that
the peices will coalesce, and they do. The world portrayed in
these poems - because even the “prose” is really poetry - is
harsh and beautiful. It’s the world we all inhabit, but seldom
see unless we have been cast out of the snug circle of the “fortunate.”
Our gain is also our loss, however, as Hall shows in his ability
to transcend the larger culture’s perceptions of his “kind”
by using the broken pieces of dreams, families and opportunities
to reflect back a thing made more beautiful by its fragmentation:
Spearing pineapple rings from a can with a stick
piqued by the moment’s tenacity - its appropriation of
the wrecking yard around the epiphany
I have unfolded the road map of the axhead
& found even in its wagon ruts & foot paths
the same devotion to flung balance - the same hierophany
a tree displays in its cold twigs & seed tips &
unfullblown asymmetrical ornament-hammered gasket-
crumbled
(Father a serial killer of pets
Mother a falsie shielding a prone tick)
(27)
Once
the violence of Trouble Sleeping becomes and comes out,
a thread becoming wider and more overt throughout the whole
of his collections, it seems almost purged through the process
of this collection, compared to where he eventually goes in
An Oak Hunch (2005). Writing of one of the fragments
of the collection as a "How Poems Work" column in
The Globe and Mail (November 17, 2001), poet Glen Downie
writes:
Thus, in a few words, Hall evokes
and links family, rural culture, social class, crude sexuality,
abuse, violence, alcohol, sentimentality, loneliness, and repressed
rage ― all the themes of this book, and of most of Hall's
work. Without narrative or even verbs, the piece succeeds because
words and names always come from somewhere; they suggest parameters
of era, region and milieu.
Pent lilt indeed! The lilt of a
word's music, our music, our meaning, is in the words we pen,
or pent-up in the words we don’t. Our proximity to sex, violence,
anger and affection are all there. Each of us could write such
a poem with our talismanic characters. In poetry, the words
are who we are.
Despite
the fact that the quoted section of Downie's column could refer
to a whole range of Hall's writings, here is the actual segment
he quotes for the column, from Trouble Sleeping:
Boxer, Tippy, Chico, Sugar, Dobbin
Dobby, Mimi, DeeDee, Princess
Little Johnny-Fucker-Faster, Rusty Warren, Uncle Bobby
Sweet Daddy Siki, Whipper Billy Watson
Wilf Carter, Hal Lone Pine
daddle-daddle, bullrod
The
weight of Hall's rural Ontario, his backwoods Ontario gothic,
obviously, weighs very heavy upon him ("MAN DIES CRUSHED
BY HIS OWN ADDRESS," he writes at one point), but through
the poem feels much lighter, as though exercised through the
process of writing it out, and as a subject, changes in further
books. What in this collection writes sparingly almost, and
between so many of the lines, becomes more overt in his previous
collection, Hearthedral: A Folk-Hermetic, sitting as
a reference between other sections, running as a thread tying
together all of his books, writing:
because of what happened to me at 5
I can't sleep beside my son or bathe
my daughter
innocently ― yet a diaphragm
between thoughts & deeds
between lungs & guts
How
does that compare to an earlier fragment from Amaneunsis from
the poem "Rudolph Hess," writing:
When I was 8 I quit sucking my thumb
climbed down out of the apple tree
and started shooting ― rabbits
groundhogs
porcupines starlings
raccoons fish
a dog and
nearly my sister ―
As penance
I choose to worship by touch-study
each day's blunted detail ― and end up wishing
I had fountain-white eye-brows
like him ―
Or,
as this untitled poem, one of five included in a 2005 issue
of the Vancouver online Forget Magazine, where beyond
pain and hurt and guilt he even talks about forgiveness
(while referencing the renowned "Woodland School"
Ojibway painter Norval Morrisseau, Copper Thunderbird) writing:
Me & Morrisseau were both abused as kids
both drank like carp then sang by hand
of a Canada that deplorably survives
high in the clawed glistening air
Our giant muskrat soul kept falling apart
into butchered townships aflame with
primal colour
& the spit of the grease was the shared song
of the brush & the pen slicing
through forgiveness
Trouble Sleeping, and what pieces come after, read as someone who hasn’t
necessarily escaped his past but survived it, and moved
on; survived it, and managed to turn it into something that
wasn’t only not bad but something better and even good.
Compared to his previous work, An Oak Hunch (2005) reads
as a love-poem to rural Ontario; the collection reads as a generous
exploration and joy. It reads as something far more comfortable,
and, while not without baggage, not overcome by baggage either,
through writing Ontario landmarks such as Ottawa Valley historian
Joan Finnegan, and the late Ameliasburgh, Ontario poet Al Purdy.
KILLDEER
on my oozing stumps
has
drummed her wings long & hard
whipped the years' butcher block rings
into
crèche shavings
beaten nests of feathered chips
by
simulated soar
folded herself into my pages
boatingly
her desperate ruse of broken wing
has
settled into gunwales
her closed cry
a
prow's nib
the stumps' roots
I
thought destined to be fences
are a mob of keels righting
little
brown-speckled eggs
safe—adrift—hoving-to
as
cloud-shadow swamps fields
the age of flight is followed
by
the age of sail (An Oak Hunch)
Written
as a series of five long poems as five essays, An Oak Hunch
has a wonderful sense of the multi-vocal, whether in his piece
"The Interview," dedicated "to Joan Finnigan,
her devotion to voices other than her own," the piece "An
Oak Hunch: Essay On Purdy," or the last section, "Index
of First Lines" (subtitled "an angry mob of basted
journals) that Hall talks about in his notes, saying that "This
poem is a boiling-off of first lines from earlier books to try
to see more clearly the sub-narratives that have keeled the
life—a Windex of First Lines, perhaps—a compacted Selected
Poems, perhaps." This suggestion becomes interesting
considering how difficult it would be to actually compile a
selected poems of Phil Hall, with so much of his work produced
in longer forms and moving into the book as unit of composition,
the way much of bpNichol's writing was. How would you be able
to select any into a single volume that represented his
entire oeuvre?
FROM PLOSIVE TO DIGRAPH, from willseed
to
peregrination, over the peaks of the
resolute hills,
through the windows of the tall buildings,
I was
alphabetizing the obvious (a chickadee—a
minted
toothpick—a crying-at-bingo smell).
Saying the old, chipped words, I liked
to think
I was helping them to pray too—words
don't know
how to read, books
don't know how to read—they need
my weak eyes—I thought, like some
missionary to
island lepers—and the words were the
missionaries—
I am the one with these stinking wounds
in the
palms of my hands—these gifts? —my
articulate
hands that can not make straight arrows.
Pity Philoctetes, ye summer boaters,
who roar past his
island in your floppy
hats, flinging empty beer cans at
his pines—the epauletteless
shadow of the blackbird
flies out of your marshes
too—its flight a red and
yellow wound, its cry
a coffin hinge.
Less
on the wounded bird, Phil Hall's An Oak Hunch reads more
as an admission of the poet-as-magpie, collecting everything,
including himself. You can see it in his piece "An Oak
Hunch: Essay On Purdy" that thanks, in the notes at the
end, "the Silversides Pioneer Tool Collection at the Rideau
Canal Museum, Smiths Falls, Ontario." What the text doesn’t
tell you is that the pioneer tool collection he speaks of was
donated by the father of his wife, Ann Silversides, and that
the un-donated remainder of tools, doorknobs and other bric-a-brac
sits in a variety of forms of organization in their cabin, barn
and shed near Perth, Ontario, filled to the nearly brim with
the kinds of rural Ontario collecting that Hall himself has
been doing for decades in his poems.
PITY WHAT IS LEFT OF US & OUR COUNTRY
as we dismantle & burn for cheap
warmth
the guy-tropes he brought forward on his back
to get us here & past here
After
finally seeing Phil Hall read, in Ottawa in August of 2005 at
the TREE Reading Series, it stressed the importance of both
ritual and found objects in Hall's writing and reading process.
The reading even began with a ritual he has of placing small
and otherwise ordinary enough objects on a table beside where
he was to perform; if you were visit the family cottage in Perth,
Ontario, you would discover the range of found objects that
are organized throughout the property, from machine parts to
a series of found photographs (one is on the cover of An
Oak Hunch), and the collection of two complete decks (so
far) of found playing cards. As he wrote in his piece "A
poetics essay (rewritten)," posted on The Griffin Trust
For Excellence in Poetry website:
I perform when I read. I care whether listeners have
a good, provocative, magical time or not, so I try to ritualize
& make sacred the time during which I share my work. For
this, the text needs not to be sacred. It is a show, not a slide-show
of the pages of a book.
Humour; storytelling; fetishism; the long, amateur,
oral memory; call & response; repetition; reference to literary
characters & traditions; all of those are part of
what I try to offer along with & in among poems
and parts of poems.
One of my models for a good show is Bruce "Utah"
Phillips who will mix a musical concert with Wobbly history
& personal history, blending these with songs (his own &
by others) toward a learning & lightening of the assembled
group ― a chautauqua.
Such
a list of things even appear in the title poem of the collection
The Unsaid, writing:
When I look into Neruda's hunger
for collector's items
I see a splashed reflection
of my own magpiety
―
not Voltaire's inkwell
or 'the only authentic Sphinx bone'
I starve for ― but folk oddments
my tribe's fetishes ―
half a doorknob, a bird's beak
a VIA Rail coat button, a carved wooden
acorn
the vertebra of a Cretan fish
a token good for one loaf of bread
from L. Catlin Bakery
in Revelstoke B.C., 1936, a money clip
concealing a jack-knife & file
How
does Hall make a list poem seem more than just a list? Responding
to the presentation to the work in An Oak Hunch, poet
and critic Ruth Roach Pierson starts her review of the book
by writing:
What a complex, many-layered, rich work An Oak
Hunch is. Should I confess my sense of inadequacy vis-à-vis
this book up front? I think Phil Hall might. When I agreed to
review this, his most recent volume of poems (the 15th
if one counts the four chapbooks), I had no idea what I was
letting myself in for. Initially I was somewhat baffled by the
words on the page. But when I heard Hall read at my local Toronto
bookstore (Another Story on Roncesvalles), I was captivated
by this poet whose reading of his own work infuses it with heart
and viscera. Turning off my pedantic 'demander-of-full-understanding
brain' I began to hear the muscular musicality of the poems,
to respond to their emotions. I was hooked.
After
hearing him read myself, it would be very hard not to
be hooked; Hall performs a very personal and warm welcome to
his audience. For An Oak Hunch, the collection that marked
his twentieth year publishing with Brick Books, the press release
begins with:
Phil Hall’s aesthetic is like no other in this country.
He remains every bit as much a “people’s poet” as Milton Acorn
or Tom Wayman, but he loves the arcane and the experimental
as well as the plain. His work reconciles these opposites, making
him an experimental poet with a populist heart.
Unlike
much of his previous work, the book received significant attention
as part of the Griffin Prize Canadian shortlist, along with
titles by compatriot Erin Mouré and Saskatoon poet Sylvia Legris
(who went on to win); a shortlist that was called "risky
by conventional poetry standards" by Patricia Robertson
in The Globe and Mail. As CBC reporter Barbara Carey
wrote:
If Nerve Squall is all electricity, Phil Hall's
An Oak Hunch is like the scabby, weathered stump of an
old tree, full of what Hall calls (in a typically striking phrase)
"treasure knots in wood." In this ninth collection,
the Toronto writer reinvents the poetic staple of personal anecdote
by digging up the "sub-narratives" of a life growing
up poor in rural Ontario. The poems encompass family history
("The Great Hunger had destroyed crop after / crop of my
ancestors… I had to eat their stories to know them, had / to
plant and plow under their little songs in mine") and tributes
to other writers with whom Hall feels a kinship (in a poem about
CanLit great Al Purdy, the wind in a cornfield is "the
paper applause of an ancient voice"). Hall's poems are
no picnic to read. They're densely knotted and halting (as he
puts it, "Pain ― the sharpener / has attached a grindstone").
But their stunning metaphors make An Oak Hunch a strong
contender.
In
the piece "Reading Outside: Phil Hall" that he published
in Calgary's weekly ffwd (Thursday, June 22, 2006), Calgary
poet and critic derek beaulieu wrote of Phil Hall's still-recent
tenure as writer-in-residence at Pierre Burton House in Dawson
City, Yukon:
Phil Hall has never really considered himself a Canadian
poet ― even to the point of writing that "Canada
is dead" ― but his recent residency has partially
shaken his "pretty disgruntled" feeling towards Canadian
nationalism.
Hall argues that Ottawa forgets that much of Canada
doesn’t look south to the United States for inspiration ―
an opinion that was reinforced during his four-month stay at
the Pierre Berton House (the former house of that most Canadian
of authors) in Dawson City, Yukon. "Newfoundland looks
to Ireland, and the majority of the films entered in the Dawson
City Short Film Festival came from Scandinavia," he says.
Hall wanted to "go north," feeling that
Canada needs to integrate a knowledge of its north into its
sense of self, so that we are not satisfied to determine simply
as "not American." He was embarrassed, then, to find
his Canadian nationalism was bolstered when he looked out of
the Pierre Burton House to see the former homes of the British-born
Robert Service, and the American-born Jack London.
For
all the Ontario gothic in the content, can we argue a placelessness
in his language? Hall is very aware of language and place, but
the difference is, he doesn’t let either of them get in the
way, using them both as jumping off points and tools for exploration;
to know Hall's references is to know enough to find them in
his writing, to read so deep that they can't help but let themselves
be found. Referencing the American poets Clayton Eshleman and
Robert Duncan, both influences on the poetry of Phil Hall, beaulieu
goes on to write:
Eshleman most famously has combined interests in
poetry and archaeology into manuscripts that engage in "psychological
cave-digging," while "Robert Duncan said that he had
a primal base for intellect, not a studied one, and claimed
that he had the advantage of starting with no talent at all."
"Eshleman spoke of his writing as a struggle,
and his writing has evolved through physical work, psychological
work ― his themes have changed and forms have evolved.
I am drawn to the idea of poets having a failure book and a
wonder book."
Hall is reticent to define his poetry around a single
subject. "To base an entire poetics around subject is to
enforce a false-ceiling ― its too limited," he says.
Hall is more interested in the rhythms and patterns that can
occur in self-exploration, which is where the idea of "auto-didacticism"
enters into Hall's poetics. His poetry is constantly about trying
to educate ― not just the reader, but the poet as well
― and he believes that in order to work on craft, a poet
should learn to "listen more carefully."
Readers
too, should learn to listen more carefully, especially those
who walk into Hall's work with their minds made up, either missing
or not comprehending whole threads of his Ontario gothic tapestry;
what makes the language of work? Responding to an earlier draft
of this piece in an email, Hall himself wrote:
What you say about Lisa Robertson & Tom Wayman
is particularly interesting: the double & work writing etc.
The double as in "Borges Y Yo" that great prose poem.
The double also as in lost twin. Purdy & many other poets
have guilt about surviving a twin in the womb, or in the early
years. And the guilt makes them sing. As the source of my survivor
guilt, I have the alternative me: I was almost named Wayne Aldred.
And I was certainly not the son expected or wanted. To educate
yourself out of your class leaves an extra body-shape with a
void. Exile is a hole with your profile. Shame & Guilt are
the names of my two great little speakers, interchangeably bass
& treble. Thus Holly Phillips, my name pulled inside out
like a glove, with the fingers left inside, phillopian tubes.
Thus "a Mandelstam in Guthrie clothing." Thus killdeer
& owl… The split focus. Remember in highschool how you had
to scratch smoked glass twice and peer through to get the right
strobe effect? Those two scratch-lines very close to each other,
I see now, were I's: II. Two I's are better than one. Also,
my disillusion with "the new work writing" (despite
my admiration for Tom's poems & essays) resulted from two
issues that gradually niggled. Although Wayman put a lot of
effort into promoting his revelation about work as the lost
subject for poems, I came to understand that it was personality
based, that the subject was his alone ultimately. His converts
have all drifted to their own regions, or stopped writing altogether
after the work anthologies. Poetics-wise, the logic breaks down
for me. To base a poetics on subject. A poem is too "over-determined,"
& its subject is the event of itself. Subject, I have come
to see, is always linked to nostalgia. And nostalgia denies
a poem its "first nation," drains it of current &
current-ness, makes it a secondary event. If "The Oxford
Book of English Verse" is full of secondary events starting
with Ballads & Chaucer's Tales, it seems natural that the
Double would appear, first as a storyteller acting as the mythic
character, proceeding and shapechanging all the way to the dark
presence of Lorca's "duende." Perhaps the Double is
the spectre of the denied poem that poets have been pointing
away from (back to events) down through the centuries.
In
the end, Hall keeps two token birds: the killdeer, to distract
us, and the magpie, doubling and teaming up against themselves
as Hall keeps writing his endless collection of Ontario folk-tales,
and working back and forth between himself. In another untitled
poem from Forget Magazine, he references birds again,
writing:
I'd like a bird to live on me
wouldn’t have to name it
Far from the roots of doors
in a grass-skirt—these same glasses
bestirred together (fromgether?)
by the landing-breeze of its claws
I'd spill food on myself to feed it—& feeding
it would clean me (that might feel
good)
My brain the thumbprint on a window high up
I'd not look out from nor in through
again
I'd stand & chew in the grip of its orbit
unable to put a face or place to my
name
Works Cited:
Barnholden,
Michael and Andrew Klobucar, eds. Writing Class: The Kootenay
School of Writing Anthology. Vancouver BC: New Star Books,
1999.
beaulieu,
derek. "Looking outside of Canadian poetry," ffwd
weekly, Volume 11, No. 28. Calgary AB: Thursday, June 22,
2006.
Bowering,
George. A Magpie Life: Growing A Writer. Toronto ON:
Key Porter Books, 2001.
Butling,
Pauline and Susan Rudy. "'why not be excessive,' a conversation
with Erin Mouré" Poets Talk: Conversations with Robert
Kroetsch, Daphne Marlatt, Erin Mouré, Dionne Brand, Marie Annharte
Baker, Jeff Derksen and Fred Wah. Edmonton AB: University
of Alberta Press, 2005.
Carey,
Barbara. "Prize Fighters: Sizing up the Griffin Poetry
Prize finalists." Toronto ON: April 7, 2006. www.cbc.ca/arts/books/griffin.html
Collis,
Stephen. Phyllis Webb and the Common Good. Vancouver
BC: Talonbooks, 2007.
Connolly,
Kevin. " Canadian Poetry: The Year in Review," The
Third MacMillan Anthology. Eds. John Metcalf and Kent Thompson.
Toronto ON: Macmillan of Canada, 1990.
Dempsey,
Ian. review of The Unsaid, cm magazine, p 182,
October 1993.
Downie,
Glen. "from Trouble Sleeping," "How Poems Work"
column. The Globe and Mail, Saturday, November 17, 2001,
p. D26.
Farr,
Roger. Surplus. Burnaby BC: LINEbooks, 2006.
Hall,
Phil. "A poetics essay (rewritten)," Poet's Blog,
Griffin Poetry Prize website, griffinpoetryprize.com/blog/index.php?cat=20
________.
A Minor Operation. Toronto ON: blewointmentpress, 1983.
________.
An Oak Hunch. London ON: Brick Books, 2005.
________. Amanuensis. London ON: Brick Books,
1989.
________.
A Writer’s Guide To Restaurants. chapbook. Vancouver
BC: Flat Singles Press, 1982.
________.
Eighteen Poems. Mexico City: Cyanamid, 1973; revised.
Toronto ON: Beautiful Outlaw, 2005.
________.
email dated February 3, 2007.
________.
Hearthedral, A Folk-Hermetic. London ON: Brick Books,
1996.
________.
Homes. Windsor ON: Black Moss Press, 1979.
________.
Lamaze Kit. broadside. Toronto ON: The League of Canadian
Poets, .
________
(as Holly Phillips). Les Transparents (after Rene Char).
Toronto ON: Flat Singles Press, 2002.
________.
Old Enemy Juice. Kingston ON : Quarry Press, 1988.
________.
The Bad Sequence. Toronto ON: BookThug, 2004.
________.
The Crucifiction. Flat Singles Press, 1979.
________.
Unison-Light. Flat Singles Press, 1985.
________.
“The Killdeer” New Westminster BC: Event – The Douglas College
Review. Volume 33, Number 1, Summer 2004.
________.
The Unsaid. London ON: Brick Books, 1992.
________.
"Tillsonburg," Shop Talk. Vancouver BC: Pulp
Press, 1985.
________.
Trouble Sleeping. London ON: Brick Books, 2000.
________.
Why I Haven’t Written. Ilderton ON: Brick Books, 1985.
Hamburger,
Michael. "Introduction," Poems of Paul Celan,
trans. Hamburger. New York NY: Persea books, 1972.
Lee,
Dennis, ed. The New Canadian Poets 1970-1985. Toronto
ON: McClelland & Stewart, 1985.
Robertson,
Patricia. "A poet's winning season," The Globe
and Mail. Toronto ON: Tuesday, June 27, 2006.
Newlove,
John. "Everywhere I Go," 7 Disasters, 3 Theses,
and Welcome Home. Click. 1971.
________.
"Everywhere I Go," Eli Mandel, Ed. Poets of Contemporary
Canada 1960-1970. Toronto ON: McClelland & Stewart,
1972.
Norris,
Ken, ed. Canadian Poetry Now: 20 Poets of the '80's.
Toronto ON: Anansi, 1984.
Page,
Joanne. "Foreward," Arguments with the World: Essays
by Bronwen Wallace. Kingston ON: Quarry Press, 1992.
Pierson,
Ruth Roach. "A Pine Inkling," a review of An Oak
Hunch. Fredericton NB: The Fiddlehead, No. 228, summer
2006.
Robertson,
Lisa. "Palinodes," The Chicago Review, 51:4
& 52:1, spring 2006.
________.
The Men. Toronto ON: BookThug, 2006.
Suknaski,
Andrew. "Mandel Memoir," Essays on Canadian
Writing, issue
45/46, winter/spring 1991/2.
________.
"out of narayan to bifrost/the word arresting
entropy," Brick magazine, 1980.
Vaisius,
Andrew. review of Hearthedral by Phil Hall, The Church
Not Made With Hands by John Terpstra and Zhivago's Fire
by Andrew Wreggitt. Winnipeg MB: Prairie Fire (summer
1998).
Wallace,
Bronwen. Common Magic. Ottawa ON: Oberon Press, 1985.
Wayman,
Tom. "Split Shift and After: Some Issues of the New Work
Writing." A Country Not Considered: Canada, culture,
work. Toronto ON: Anansi, 1993.
________.
"Introduction: Ground Work." Inside Job: Essays
on the New Work Writing. Madeira Park, BC: Harbour Publishing,
1983.
Webb,
Phyllis. Hanging Fire. Toronto ON: Coach House Press,
1990.